Share:

Impeach and Disbar US Supreme Court Justices For Proselytizing Paedophilia

Submitted to Petition2Congress: 14Aug2020
Petition2Congress –7/28/2020
Remove and Disbar all US Supreme Court Justices
Date: 27July2020
Know The Beast
Oaths of Office
As noted below in Article VI, all federal officials must take an oath in support of the Constitution:


“The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”


The Constitution does not provide the wording for this oath, leaving that to the determination of Congress. From 1789 until 1861, this oath was, “I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States.” During the 1860s, this oath was altered several times before Congress settled on the text used today, which is set out at 5 U. S. C. § 3331. This oath is now taken by all federal employees, other than the President:


“I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”


The origin of the second oath is found in the Judiciary Act of 1789, which reads “the justices of the Supreme Court, and the district judges, before they proceed to execute the duties of their respective offices” to take a second oath or affirmation. From 1789 to 1990, the original text used for this oath (1 Stat. 76 § 8) was:


“I, _________, do solemnly swear or affirm that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as _________, according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”


In December 1990, the Judicial Improvements Act of 1990 replaced the phrase “according to the best of my abilities and understanding, agreeably to the Constitution" with "under the Constitution.” The revised Judicial Oath, found at 28 U. S. C. § 453, reads:
“I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as _________ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”

Upon occasion, appointees to the Supreme Court have taken a combined version of the two oaths, which reads:


“I, _________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as _________ under the Constitution and laws of the United States; and that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

Why should I discuss the chair? Because 1972 is mentioned …to sooth consciences? To distract the public from the haneous vehicular homicide caused by the Washington DC Satanic Underground, of which Joe Biden obviously initiated himself in as an agreement to rig the election so he would become Senator of Delaware? Philadelphia, PA is on the Delaware River.
MAHOGANY BENCH CHAIR
CHIPPENDALE sounds like Chip And Dale (strippers)
Among the treasured objects in the Supreme Court’s historical collection is this mahogany bench chair used by Chief Justice John Marshall from 1819 to 1835. While documentation of the chair’s maker is not definitive, it is most likely the work of Benjamin Belt, a local Washington, D.C. cabinetmaker who was hired to make seven desks and seven chairs for the Supreme Court to replace those lost after the British burned the United States Capitol in 1814.
Following the death of Chief Justice Marshall in 1835, a new set of furniture was made for the Courtroom. When the old furniture was sold as excess property, Deputy Clerk D. W. Middleton purchased the chair used by Marshall and placed it in his home. In 1900, the Middleton family sold the chair and the new owner bequeathed it back to the Court in 1936.
Satanism is Terrorism
Satanism includes DECEPTION
The writer of this Petition claims it is common knowledge that Washington is filled with Satanists in leadership roles. They protect the crooks and are crooks themselves. This dynamic only worsens to this day, despite the very fact one of the obligations of the US Supreme Court is to Check Powers, hold political leaders accountable. Instead, the government has been outsourced and they use a blame game. The reason this deterioration has occurred is because in part, the US Supreme Court has been conducting themselves as a Satanic Culture rather than serving as patriots with real minds of judges. They do not even have minds of attorneys because they lack administration of the law unless it is good for publicity. If they did their jobs there would be much fewer illicit arrests, Law Enforcement would be structured appropriately rather than being allowed to abuse power to craft this country into a Police State as Hitler did. Hitler’s popularity was based on first crashing the economy and then promising the public at large as well as his NAZI members that all will be well, he has plans to make a lot of money for the country. Citizens were greatly weakened and Hitler enjoyed being their Deceiver In Chief. That is what is going on with our country today because the US Supreme Court is not doing their jobs and this writer believes they are also taking part in the nefarious activity so they may profit from the harm they do to the public! Follow the money! The Coronavirus Agenda increased the incomes of very rich people because they planned it for a long time. Really Graceful and Corbett Report on YouTube have reported the facts on who profited on the destruction of the economy. Jaimee Lee of A Plane Truth 4U reported on the miles of tents in California due to people being forced out of their homes, losing their livelihoods – all because of this fake Coronavirus Agenda! Joe Imbriano of Fullerton Informer and Wiki Joe is fervently explaining in detail the harms of 5G intended to be used as a mass murder weapon and more; the fake Coronavirus PLANdemic and the immense destructive plan which these sociopathic technocrats have been rolling out when they get away with it; the nefarious scientific and medical underground that undermines the general public’s well-being using Satanic Practices of DECEPTION to make money with no regard for the safety of their patients. Many people know people who have been victims of medical malpractice, as well as having experienced it themselves. The court system corrupts the medical industry, even congratulating themselves for winning multimillion dollar lawsuits on cases involving just a few thousand dollars in medical costs – the biggest liar wins. More DECEPTION. The writer claims that this is what the US Supreme Court Justices are promoting.
Science is has been replaced with Culture, no facts. Social Engineering. This is a criminal agenda disrupting the public. It has only worsened because the US SUPREME COURT IS MORE INTERESTED IN SERVING THEMSELVES. FOLLOW THE MONEY. FOLLOW THEIR DELI BERATE EVASION OF DUTIES. SEE THE MANY UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTIONS OF PRESIDENT TRUMP, (Article 2 of the US Constitution), INCLUDING THE RECENT MURDER OF IRAN’S RESPECTED AND BELOVED GENERAL SOLEIMANI. Contrary to the LIES of Secretary Pompeo, General Soleimani was not even found on a terrorist list by this writer, let alone be declared as the most dangerous person in the world, as Pompeo and Trump lied about. Why is this US Supreme Court allowing the pathological lying of the White House? This writer’s assumption is that they belong to the Satanic Underground which only cares about criminal hijacking of this country, which they consider a NEW WORLD ORDER.
Adolf Hitler was a Satanist. Hundreds of criminal NAZIS who murdered many innocent people during WW2, were given asylum in the USA and they furthered their nefarious agenda as an Enemy Within.
Quote from Hitler:
“I have not come into the world to make man better, but to make use of their weaknesses”
This fashioned ideology has, at the least, visibly not been resisted by the US Supreme Court, despite the fact it is part of their job in order to uphold the US Constitution and protect the rights of We The People. They are crafting our government into a socialistic police state, rather than preserving a free country. The Patrior Act is Unconstitutional and was voted down in 1995 because insiders knew that the Oklahoma City Murrow Building bombing was done by CIA operatives to, in part, help Bill Clinton since he got Janet Reno to transfer all FBI files to that building so it could be destroyed in a bombing as delivery was anticipated being completed. A CIA operative who left the institution of crime, has shared publically what occurred at the Oklahoma City Bombing and several other CIA activities, including September 11. His name is Robert Snogres, aka Cody Snogres. A full transcript of his testimony on a radio show is provided on this writer’s blog, www.PubliusRoots.com
The US Supreme Court Justices have opportunity to be part of solutions. Instead, they have consistently proven to be part of the problems! Follow the money; that is their main motive.
To focus on the one issue of PAEDOPHILIA, the US Supreme Court Justices are committing treason by proselytizing paedophilia! We know that CIA has had the largest child trafficking business throughout the world. Violating the safety and security of children, including torture and murder – to contribute to the child trafficking – is TREASON! The DACA Law is nefarious from the beginning. This law is structured to feed Wall Street with crime money, as many laws are. EACH JUSTICE WAS WELL AWARE OF WHAT WENT ON SEPTEMBER 11, yet this writer is unaware of anything they did to hold anyone accountable. They supported Elizabeth Warren’s plotting and planning to waste $19 million on a Commission that only lied and covered up the truth, that Americans murdered Americans that day. Americans destroyed billions of dollars of property – even trillions. They Bilked Wall Street to reap their monetary benefits. The Sandy Hook FAKE Shooting in Connecticut was an operative by Barack Obama, et al to bilk the economy of at least one trillion dollars. NOBODY DIED.
The Justices are Absent in their duties, which creates a lawlessness – their deliberate failure to act on circumstances in which President Trump violates the US Constitution as well as his duties of office is TREASON! Deliberate negligence on laws which protect the most precious commodity in society – children – is EVIL, particularly when they are promoting removal of laws which violate the US Constitution. No reinvention of word meanings satisfies this activity. It only makes it worse and proves their intent, as this writer perceives, to satisfy the will of the Satanic Underground, which they may all be directly part of. The Absence of Evidence is Evidence of Absence.

Duties of US Supreme Court
As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution.
Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power.
Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution.

The Writer Of This Petition Claims
On The Issue of Paedophilia
Yet Calls out to all Attorneys to Please
Prosecute by Applying these Oaths and Detailed Descriptions of Duties of Office
1. There is no law which permits the US Supreme Court Justices to break the law.
2. Immunity is subjective and reliant of Theories of Law, Caselaws, and other sources of which this writer is unable to address.
3. No US Supreme Court Justice can legally order an assassination
4. No Government Official, including US President has any legitimate right to order an assassination on a presumption, which follows the same ideology of ENTRAPMENT.
5. Paedophilia is criminal behavior. Criminals should face justice – not “Just us”
6. We are born to love; we learn to hate. Paedophiles are predators. The word itself was constructed. It did not originate in Greece. Yet the prefix and suffix are Greek origins, the latter of which is acclaimed to mean love, which is a subjective meaning, since Philanderer uses the same derivative and yet it means one who has sex as a sport.
7. Throughout the Ages, Sex has been used as a weapon for power as well as an opportunity to persuade. As biologically-driven humans, we have an innate responsibility to each other to not “cross the line” and violate trust – particularly when it comes to children. DECEPTION is manifested when this society spends so much money on education for children, children’s healthcare, yet also allows the trafficking of children because it feeds big businesses, feeds Wall Street at the cost of even their lives since paedophiles are known to be killers oftentimes.
8. STALKING is illegal. This includes Internet Stalking as well. Tapping phones is also illegal unless there is a warrant for it. The Patriot Act is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. It was written first by Joe Biden, who enjoyed being labled the youngest senator to ever win an election, obviously rigged by the Satanic Underground and he “sacrificed” his family as proof of his loyalty to them. This writer claims a stringent profiling of Biden should have been ordered by the US Supreme Court Justices and a stringent investigation of the auto wreck, which most likely involved a laser weapon, probably made by John G. Trump, for the CIA. What caused his wife to swerve away? Was someone pointing a weapon at her? The effects of a laser are much harder to determine than the effects of a gun. The CIA even have a “heart attack gun” which has caused many to die of heart attacks yet nobody holds them accountable – Ambassador Du Wei was in excellent health condition and only 58 years old. Yet he died of a heart attack with no underlying conditions. As narcissistic as CIA are, they enjoy murdering people right in plain sight, which is what happened to JFK and Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr – either directly themselves or through hired people who are given specific instructions. Did others speak out and their testimonies suppressed? The rich Elite pay people to stalk under the guise of investigators. There are so many investigation companies in the United States that one like this writer can only determine this to be nefarious activity at large. The state of Connecticut has well over 100. Probably even ten times more than that.

PAEDOPHILIA / PEDOPHILIA
History
Layman’s Research


The Word Paedophilia was first introduced in the late 1800’s. According to Internet, Search Results

Featured snippet from the web
molest. To molest someone is to annoy or attack them. ... The word originally meant simply "to cause trouble or grief," and it comes from the Latin word molestare, "to disturb, trouble, or annoy." It wasn't used to mean "attack sexually" until about 1950.
Unfortunately, this writer cannot find the information on who attached this meaning to the word. It is likely to be someone in law enforcementor a nefarious politician who devised this meaning to allude that sexual predators are not evil.
Sadism. ... Sadism, psychosexual disorder in which sexual urges are gratified by the infliction of pain on another person. The term was coined by the late 19th-century German psychologist Richard von Krafft-Ebing in reference to the Marquis de Sade, an 18th-century French nobleman who chronicled his own such practices.
Etymology[edit]
From French sadisme. Named after the Marquis de Sade, famed for his libertine writings depicting the pleasure of inflicting pain to others. The word for "sadism" (sadisme) was coined or acknowledged in the 1834 posthumous reprint of French lexicographer Boiste's Dictionnaire universel de la langue française; it is reused along with "sadist" (sadique) in 1862 by French critic Sainte-Beuve in his commentary of Flaubert's novel Salammbô; it is reused (possibly independently) in 1886 by Austrian psychiatrist Krafft-Ebing in Psychopathia Sexualis which popularized it; it is directly reused in 1905 by Freud in Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality which definitively established the word.
Pronunciation[edit]
• IPA(key): /seɪdɪzəm/
Noun[edit]
sadism (countable and uncountable, plural sadisms)
1. (chiefly psychiatry) The enjoyment of inflicting pain or humiliation without pity.
2. Achievement of sexual gratification by inflicting pain or humiliation on others, or watching pain or humiliation inflicted on others.
3. (in general) Deliberate cruelty, either mental or physical, to other people, or to animals, regardless of whether for (sexual) gratification.
Related terms[edit]
• sadist
• sadistic
• sadomasochism
• zoosadism
• spineless sadism
• tyrannical sadism
• enforcing sadism
• explosive sadism
Translations[edit]
±show ▼psychology: the enjoyment of inflicting pain or humiliation
±show ▼sexual gratification from inflicting pain or humiliation, or watching it inflicted
±show ▼deliberate cruelty
The translations below need to be checked and inserted above into the appropriate translation tables, removing any numbers. Numbers do not necessarily match those in definitions. See instructions at Wiktionary:Entry layout § Translations.
show ▼Translations to be checked

Pederasty (Black’s Law Dictionary, 7th Edition) Anal intercourse between a man and a boy. Pederasty is illegal in all states. aka Sodomy
Peeping Tom: Person who spies on another (as through a window) to gain sexual pleasure aka Voyeur
Source: https://www.americamagazine.org/issue/534/article/11th-century-scandal
Quote: Most important, his story shows that we have overcome sexual abuse scandals in the past by upholding faithfulness to our tradition and maintaining vigilance against corruption.
INVENTION OF WORD MEANINGS INCLUDES INVOLVEMENT OF THE DEPRAVED SECRET SOCIEITIES TO SOOTH CONSCIENCES AND USE AS A FORM OF MASS MIND CONTROL, CRYPTING/SCRIPTING
Modest vs Molest: Etymology
molest (v.)
late 14c., molesten, "to cause trouble, grief, or vexation, disturb, harass," from Old French molester "to torment, trouble, bother" (12c.) and directly from Latin molestare "to disturb, trouble, annoy," from molestus "troublesome, annoying, unmanageable," which is perhaps related to moles "mass" (see mole (n.3)) on notion of either "burden" or "barrier." Meaning "sexually assault" is attested by 1950. Related: Molested; molesting.

modest (adj.)
1560s, "having moderate self-regard, restrained by a sense of propriety or humility," from Middle French modeste (14c.), from Latin modestus "moderate, keeping due measure, sober, gentle, temperate," from modus "measure, manner" (from PIE root *med- "take appropriate measures"). Of women, "not improper or lewd, pure in thought and conduct," 1590s; of female attire, "not gaudy or showy," 1610s. Of demands, etc., "not excessive or extreme," c. 1600. Related: Modestly.

Sex vs Six
Source: https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=sex
Note, the writer of this Petition emphasizes that in this circumstance, internet is used as a social engineering weapon, for the word Sex comes from the NUMBER SIX; ie, sextuplets means six babies born on the same day from the same mother. This is important to note, because the ROOT MEANING OF SEX IS THE NUMBER SIX – why would they make this word become the meaning we know of today? The answer is obvious – it is a carnal form of mind control by the depraved who abused power and set the social wheels in motion. They were Satanists, relying on DECEPTION to succeed in life. Revelations includes an emphasis of “The Mark of The Beast” which is “666” – sex-sex-sex They are trying to legalize the most socially illegal, and commonly unaccepted aspect of society once society rose out of the Barbarism Era. Their intent was to CONTROL by DEPRAVITY.

sex (n.)
late 14c., "males or females collectively," from Latin sexus "a sex, state of being either male or female, gender," of uncertain origin. "Commonly taken with seco as division or 'half' of the race" [Tucker], which would connect it to secare "to divide or cut" (see section (n.)).
Secus seems the more original formation, but it is strange that the older texts only know sexus. The modern meaning of sectiō 'division' suggests that sec/xus might derive from secāre 'to sever', but the morphology remains unclear: does sexus go back to an s-present *sek-s- 'to cut up', or was it derived from a form *sek-s- of the putative s-stem underlying secus? [Michiel de Vaan, "Etymological Dictionary of Latin and the other Italic Languages," Leiden, 2008]
Meaning "quality of being male or female" first recorded 1520s. Meaning "sexual intercourse" first attested 1929 (in writings of D.H. Lawrence); meaning "genitalia" is attested from 1938. Sex appeal attested by 1904.
For the raw sex appeal of the burlesque "shows" there is no defense, either. These "shows" should be under official supervision, at the least, and boys beneath the age of eighteen forbidden, perhaps, to attend their performance, just as we forbid the sale of liquors to minors. [Walter Prichard Eaton, "At the New Theatre and Others: The American Stage, Its Problems and Performances," Boston, 1910]
Sex drive is from 1918; sex object is 1901; sex symbol is 1871 in anthropology; the first person to whom the term was applied seems to have been Marilyn Monroe (1959). Sex therapist is from 1974.

Note, the writer of this Petition emphasizes that Marilyn Monroe AND Jackie Kennedy were transgenders, most likely both done by OSS, which turned into CIA with the same person leading, directing.
J. Edgar Hoover helped create CIA. As the Attorney General for 40 years, he no doubt had more control over the government and its citizens than the US Presidents – and he was a sexual deviant, NOT HAVING THE MIND OF A CREDIBLE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE LAW, LET ALONE THE MIND OF A CREDIBLE ATTORNEY GENERAL. Yet his “mission” had to do with the Secret Societies he belonged to, in efforts to DECEIVE, cause chaos, spread war, rape the economy, etc – TO CONTINUE THE #HitlerKillingMachine Plan. Hoover was put in power when Hitler disappeared from society. Whether Hitler died or not is still a mystery to the common public, who this writer is a part of. Yet most of us realize that the United States Government allowed hundreds of NAZI scientists and leaders to obtain EXILE in USA and thereby continue their devious, depraved agendas. A few commonly known agendas are: Operation Mockingbird, MK Ultra, and the Monarch Project (most likely named this to allude Queen Elizabeth had something to do with it since a very evil force in Britain and US were trying to take down the Monarchy any way they could; including setting fire to Windsor Castle, and more) The US Supreme Court Justices may have succeeded in getting them to stop these projects years ago.

crypt (n.)
early 15c., cripte, "grotto, cavern," from Latin crypta "vault, cavern," from Greek krypte "a vault, crypt" (short for krypte kamara "hidden vault"), fem. of kryptos "hidden," verbal adjective from kryptein "to hide," which is of uncertain origin. Comparison has been made to Old Church Slavonic kryjo, kryti "to hide," Lithuanian kráuti "to pile up." Beekes writes that krypto "is formally and semantically reminiscent of [kalypto]; the verbs may have influenced each other." For this, see calypto-. But he adds, "However, since there is no good IE etymology, the word could be Pre-Greek." Meaning "underground burial vault or chapel in a church" is attested by 1789.

The writer of this Petition concludes that Cyber is intended to CONTROL, NOT SERVE AS A COMMUNICATION TOOL

Cyber came from cybernetics
Cybernetics influences game, system, and organizational theory. Cybernetics derived from the Greek kubernētēs which refers to a pilot or steersman. Related is the Greek word kubernēsis which means “the gift of governance” and applies to leadership.

-phone
word-forming element meaning "voice, sound," also "speaker of," from Greek phōnē "voice, sound," from PIE root *bha- (2) "to speak, say, tell" (source also of Latin for, fari "to speak," fama "talk, report").

telephone (n.)
1835, "system for conveying words over distance by musical notes" (devised in 1828 by French composer Jean-François Sudré (1787-1862); each tone played over several octaves represented a letter of the alphabet), from French téléphone (c. 1830), from télé- "far" (see tele-) + phone "sound, voice," from PIE root *bha- (2) "to speak, tell, say." Sudré's system never proved practical. Also used of other apparatus early 19c., including "instrument similar to a foghorn for signaling from ship to ship" (1844). The electrical communication tool was first described in modern form by Philip Reis (1861); developed by Scottish-born inventor Alexander Graham Bell (1847-1922) and so called by him from 1876.

NOTE, THE WORD “TELL” CAN BE USED IN THE CONTEXT “TO COMMAND” OR “ORDER” – ONE SHOULD BE AWARE OF HOW OUR WORDS ARE DERIVED AND NOT EXPRESS ONE’S SELF IN RIDDLES WITH OPEN-ENDED THOUGHT. A COMMON TACTIC BY THE “PHILADELPHIA ATTORNEY” AS KNOWN IN HISTORY TO BE EVEN COMMENDABLE WITHIN THE BAR ASSOCIATION. DECEPTION WAS AND IS OFTENTIMES REWARDED. YET IT BRINGS CHAOS TO INDIVIDUALS AND SOCIETY.

Paedophiles are Shunned Upon by Religious Faiths
Satanism PROMOTES Paedphilia

JEWISH FAITH
https://jewishjournal.com/commentary/opinion/120495/ - The Torah and Child Sex Abuse

In conclusion: The bottom line in all matters regarding abuse is one and only one thing: protecting the innocent. Not the reputation of an individual, not the reputation of the community, not anything but the welfare of our children. In every given case, whether to publicize, whether to take any other action, the question that must be asked is this: What is best for the victims? Will or can this action help prevent someone from being hurt or not? If the answer is yes or even maybe yes, then the action should be taken.
Rabbi Simon Jacobson is the author of the best-selling book “Toward a Meaningful Life.” He heads The Meaningful Life Center (meaningfullife.com), in Manhattan, N.Y., which bridges the secular and the spiritual through a wide variety of live and on-line programming.
These are comments made online:

Everything we build and teach our children, all our investments and dedication to good, all our moral standards, our entire education system, can be wiped out in one fell swoop when we or our children are violated.
The first of all ethical and Torah axioms must be stated at the outset: No one has a right to in any way violate in any way the body or soul of another human being. Indeed, we don’t even have the right to mutilate our own bodies, because your body does not belong to you; it is “Divine property.”
No crime is worse that assaulting another’s dignity — which is compared to the dignity of G-d Himself, being that every person was created in the Divine Image. Even a hanged murderer must not be defiled and his body not left to hang overnight because it reflects the Divine Image. How much more so — infinitely more so — regarding a live person and innocent child.
Abuse, in any form or shape, physical, psychological, verbal, emotional or sexual, is above all a violent crime — a terrible crime. Abusing another (even if it’s intangible) is no different than taking a weapon and beating someone to a pulp. And because of its terrible long-term effects, the crime is that much worse.
The next question is this: What are our obligations as parents, teachers, writers, Web site editors or just plain adult citizens when it comes to abuse?
On one hand, we are talking about protecting innocent people from criminal predators, which clearly is a major obligation and a priority concern. On the other hand, we do have laws prohibiting embarrassing people (even criminals) in public, always hopeful, allowing people to correct their ways. We have laws about avoiding gossip and speaking ill about others (lashon harah), and not feeding into the base instinct of “talking about others” or “mob mentality” witch-hunting expeditions.
We have several obligations when we see or know about a crime, as well as obligations to prevent further crimes:
1) A witness to a crime who does not testify “must bear his guilt” (Leviticus 5:1).
2) “Do not place a stumbling block before the blind” (Leviticus 19:14), which includes the obligation to warn someone from a danger we are aware of. If you see someone walking down the street and you know that farther down the block there is an uncovered pit in the ground or a man with a gun, you are obligated to warn him. If we are aware of a predator, we must do everything possible to protect people from him.
3) “Do not stand still over your neighbor’s blood (when your neighbor’s life is in danger)” (Leviticus 19:16). It’s interesting to note that this commandment follows (in the same verse) “do not go around as a gossiper among your people,” suggesting that gossip is an issue only when no life is in danger. But if a life is in danger, then “do not stand still” even if means speaking about it in public.
4) “You must admonish your neighbor, and not bear sin because of him” (Leviticus 19:17). If one does not admonish, then he is responsible for the other’s sin (Sefer HaMitzvot, Positive 205; see Shabbat 54b. 119b). Although at the outset rebuke must be done “in private, kindly and gently,” not to embarrass him publicly (Arkhin 16b; Sefer HaMitzvot, Negative 305), but if it doesn’t help, the obligation is to admonish him in public (Rambam Deos 6:8. Shulchan Aruch HaRav Hilchos Onaah v’Gneivas Daas 30).
This is true even about a crime that does not affect other people. All the care taken about public shame is because the crime does not affect the public. And even then, there are situations where the admonishment must be done publicly. By contrast, in our discussion about abuse, which affects others, all these restrictions do not apply: Embarrassment of a criminal is never an excuse or a reason to put anyone else in potential danger.
Anyone who suggests that abuse must be overlooked, because (as one person told me) it “happens all the time” and “by many people, including our leaders,” or for any other reasons — is not different from ignoring any other crime, and is in itself a grave crime.
One could even argue that the greatest “kiddush HaShem” (sanctifying God’s name) is when a Torah-based community demonstrates that it doesn’t just mechanically follow the laws or isn’t merely concerned with reputations, but that it sets and demands the highest standard of accountability among its citizens, and invests the greatest possible measures to protect its children from predators, create trust and absolutely will not tolerate any breach or abuse. That the greatest sin of all is ignoring or minimizing crimes being perpetrated against our most innocent and vulnerable members: our children.
MUSLIM FAITH

https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/harvey-weinstein-islam-sexual-assault-rape-womens-rights-a8001521.html

And when it comes to the Islamic concept of Hijab, it is men who are first commanded to never gawk at women, and instead guard their private parts and chastity, regardless of how women choose to dress – pre-empting sexual abuse.

This is a reasonable argument, in part, due to the hypocrisy of allegedly religious men like Congressman Tim Murphy, who condemns abortion and infidelity, yet was caught encouraging his mistress to have one, or former Indiana GOP chair Rick Halvorsen who was convicted of incest. Yes, Islam implores accountability to the creator, but rather than preach empty dogmatic theories, Islam instead prescribes a proven secular model.
Weinstein is a symptom of the greater disease of arrogance, unaccountability, societal apathy, and from men who knew of the abuse but did nothing. Islam and Prophet Muhammad provide a practical solution.
Sexual abuse of women will markedly decrease when men stop abusing women and when men stop thinking that just because they haven’t personally abused women, they have no further obligations. According to Islam, every man is accountable to stop abuse of women—by their word and by their acts. Many a
busers like Weinstein walk our streets, terrorizing our neighbors. Together, we can employ a proven Islamic model that will stop this madness, and re-invoke gender equity today in America, and the world.
Qasim Rashid is an attorney, author, and national spokesperson for the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community USA. Follow him at @MuslimIQ
MORE ABOUT:
HARVEY WEINSTEIN | SEXUAL ASSAULT | ISLAM

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340574462_Pedophilia_In_Quranic_Perspective_A_Thematic_Analysis

Is it any wonder that Malaysia and its airlines have been so greatly attacked, and their plane crashes were obviously caused by evil Satanists, who are terrorists?

Pedophilia or sexual harassment of children is a serious crime
in today’s Malaysian society.

The pdf article authored by a Muslim relies on the definition from the American Psychiatric Board, which is not reliable and subject to change at their sociopathic whims for social engineering purposes.
In this article, it says that the very thought of seeking sexual pleasure from children is pedophilia. The issue is, HOW WOULD THEY KNOW WHAT ONE PERSON IS THINKING? THIS IS SO FAR OUTSIDE THE BOX, WHICH GIVES RISE TO FALSE ARRESTS.
Pedophilia is also classified in the sexual orientation group
By the unpopular American Board of Psychiatry. Consider how much damage they have contributed to society! THE US DOES NOT HAVE A THRIVING SOCIETY. THEY ARE MANIPULATED, CONTROLLED. THIS COUNTRY HAS A SMALL NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY STAND UP FOR THE US CONSTITUTION AND THE RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC. People in social media are appauled, to say the least, that predatory sex offenders are now given a “sexual orientation” by the American Board of Psychiatry as deemed in the Diagnostic Statistical Manual -- DESPITE THE FACT THAT WHAT THEY DO ARE CRIMES. NO MEDICAL BOARD HAS POWER OVER THE LAW. HAD THEY INSTEAD ISSUED A CASE FOR REVIEW BY THE US SUPREME COURT, IT IS CONCEIVABLE THEY WOULD HAVE MENTIONED THIS. They are not mentioning that they have submitted argument to the US Supreme Court Justices and how did they get these justices to be “eating out of their hands” with no case review? This is more than far-reaching. It is violating the very administrative and legal processes which exist and yet no one is being held accountable for breaking them!
Pedophilia - does not occur only when individuals engage in stimulant behaviors of child sexual abuse, but also the act of preserving, imagining and fantasising about children sexual activity is also referred to as pedophilia (American Psychological Association, 2000; Eher et al., 2015).
The author of this article then concludes:
….every child is at risk of becoming a victim of pedophilia.
Indeed, this is not what the writer of this petition is emphasizing. The pdf author above is relying on sources which, upon being exposed, are found to be rooted in pedophile politicians as well as others. This type of thought damages society, for it is ill-based and only supported by a Culture of DECEPTION.
Children are vulnerable and need to be protected. Most or all of those Muslims who are dedicated to living faith-filled lives believe paedophilia is wrong. They are protective of their children.
CHRISTIANITY

The following source is an author’s blog who informs the public the culture of paedophilia in churches and why people did not speak out at times. https://ffrf.org/component/k2/item/18500-the-scandal-of-pedophilia-in-the-church
She goes on to say:
Studies about pedophiles (adults who prey sexually on children) have not investigated the extent of this crime within the ministry, or whether the ratio of pedophiles in the ministry is higher than that of comparable high-risk professions. Experts agree that the molesting minister is a subset of the dangerous class of "respected members of the community" who betray their position of authority and trust by sexually assaulting children. Many warn that molesters are often "good Christians."….. Jeffrey Anderson, a Minnesota attorney who specializes in sexual abuse civil suits, was aware of more than 300 civil claims against Catholic priests in 43 states through 1991, and has handled 80 cases himself. Catholic reporter Jason Berry has tracked at least 100 civil settlements by the Catholic Church in the years 1984-1990, totaling $100 million to $300 million. Of course, many such civil cases are settled secretly.
Roman Catholic canon attorney Father Thomas Doyle has estimated that about 3,000 Roman Catholic priests are pedophiliac abusers of children (an average of 16 priestly sex abusers per diocese).
Baltimore psychotherapist and former priest A.W. Richard Sipe, author of A Secret World: Sexuality and the Search for Celibacy, 1990, made a comprehensive study of the sexual conduct of priests. As a result of his study, Harper's Index 1990 published this statistic: "Estimated chances that a Catholic priest in the United States is sexually active: 1 in 2." Sipe studied 1,000 priests and 500 of their "lovers" or victims. He offered this breakdown: 20% of priests are involved in sexual relationships with women; 8-10% in "heterosexual exploration," 20% are homosexual with half of them active, 6% are pedophiles, almost 4% of them targeting boys. However, Sipes observed "the homosexual contacts are four times more likely to come to the attention of parents or authorities, especially if the sexual involvement stops short of intercourse in heterosexual cases."
The offices of the national monthly Freethought Today out of Madison, Wisconsin, receive three to four newspaper clippings per week from readers detailing a new criminal or civil court accusation against a priest or Protestant minister. It has surveyed reported cases in North America during the years of 1988 and 1989 and found 250 reported cases of criminal charges involving child-molesting priests, ministers or ministerial staff in the United States and Canada. Of the accused clergy, 75 were Catholic priests (39.5%), and 111 were Protestant ministers (58%). Also charged were one Mormon clergyman, one occult minister and two cult ministers. Protestant cases involved equal numbers of mainstream and fundamentalist/evangelical denominations. That study revealed no rabbis charged with child molestation.
Although priests make up only about 10% of North American clergy, they were 40% of the accused, leaving the Catholic Church, which complains that the media are "priest-bashing," with no grounds for criticism. With outcome unknown in about a fifth of the cases, the study found that 88% of all charged clergy were convicted, with slightly lower conviction rate for priests--81%.
A majority of cases did not go to trial, with 61% of accused reverends pleading guilty (53%) or no contest (8%). Three-quarters of all clergy who pleaded innocent were found guilty. About half of the Catholic priests pleading innocent were convicted.
The study revealed that Catholic priests were acquitted or dismissed of child molestation charges at a higher rate than Protestant ministers. Similarly, Catholic priests received a higher rate of suspended sentences when convicted, and when sentenced, spent considerably less time in jail or prison. Seventy-eight percent of convicted ministers were incarcerated with sentences as brief as 30 days in jail to as long as three lifeterms. About 10% received probation only.
The writer of this article emphasizes that the very fact that it has been difficult to prosecute Christian clergy, lies within the political and judicial leadership of this country – many just do not want to prosecute them for various reasons. Most likely the main reason is for popularity. A parish that sues its own church, such as Catholic Dioces, loses favor with the Dioces despite the fact the paedophilia actually happened and children who have been victimized have varied difficulties struggling through life, depending on the support system they have. Nevertheless, it is well agreed upon that Paedophilia greatly harms children.
The writer of this Petition resents the fact that internet does manipulate sources and when one only has internet to rely on, they can be greatly deceived on topics. As a curious person who enjoys meeting people and discussing matters of importance, the writer of this petition is very confident that pedophilia is historically a commonlaw issue in which it has never thought to be legitimate by communities. A minister was run out of the parish if he did not leave with his family that night or he would face charges and a lose any opportunity to reform. This was a common practice of churches when the parishioners discovered their minister was a paedophile. The writer of this Petition knows first hand since her father participated in removing their minister once, joining forces with other fathers of the parish. The problem is that minister most likely moved on to harm other children yet the legal battle would have broken the church’s budget and even back then, decades ago, it was well-known that most attorneys were out for themselves and not accountable when they harm people. Nevertheless, no one thought paedophilia was legitimate.
CONCLUSION
No US Supreme Court Justice should ever support known criminals to the point they want their behavior to be legalized. Logically-speaking the Justice has completely lost touch with its duties to the office of which the Justice took at least one oath for. In layman’s terms, they breached the contract. In philosophical terms, they have promoted and propelled chaos, are responsible for encouraging victimization, and those who support paedophiles are generally known to be depraved human beings.
Contrary to the new culture of science that replaces facts with lies, paedophilia is never something one is born with. This is a learned behavior. They find books, they associate with perverted people, they use psychotropic drugs. They seek out children as predators. They perfect their schemes and pride themselves in their sadistic behavior, which is an extreme form of narcissism. They get the children to be fearful of them yet love them at the same time as manipulators who only care to get what they want by violating children. The victims oftentimes develop what Dr. Sam Vaknin has coined and became popular for, “malignant self love” to survive this secret trauma throughout their lives. This is Sexual Assault. Rapists are in the same category yet at least they do not prey on children. Some sources have defined terms of paedophilia a sort of “catch me if you can” act since they emphasize that children are unaware of what sex is at that point, so they do what they are told because they are innocent children who believe that this secret relationship is somehow “special” yet they know they would be harmed if they would not do as they are told. Using this logic, how is it that people who hold the highest judicial positions in the country proselytize paedophilia, which is really raping and molesting children – violence against children? One cannot be a paedophile until they have acted out being a paedophile, which causes direct harm to at least one child. In the book, In Search For Human Nature, by Carl N. Degler, he discusses the downfall of science, the common term of “dumbing down of society”, creating science as a culture. People believing what they are told rather than through research, discovery, then final agreement. He also discussed the hope that these teaching mechanisms seemed to be reversing. The book was published in the early 1990’s and obviously the reversal he saw was a synthetic version of deception and society on the whole were submitting more and more due to personal struggles in their lives – all caused by the evil underground which has been undermining this country and enjoying overall support from Washington, DC as well as US Supreme Court Justices for the most part. Currently, it is apparent to this writer, that there is no other solution than to replace every justice and disbar them because they enjoy their behavior right in plain sight.

Prepared and Submitted by
Concerned Citizen, Pro Se

Anne M. Bradley

(c) Petition2Congress, all rights reserved. For web site support: email info@rallycongress.com or call (202) 600-8357