Share:

Unfair child support laws

Messages Sent So Far
After children turn 5 they are in school and those women who collect child support sit at home doing nothing when they could be working part time to help support there children. It use to be the male as the main source of income, not anymore, we live in tough economic times, where it takes two in the household to support children. Why should those women stay at home when they could be working. The law should be added to so that those women don't have several babies and then wait for the child support to come in. They should at least be given some finacial responsibility as well as the father. After there youngest turns 5 they should should be required to work part-time to collect there child support. Nobody should have a free ride.

Post Public Comments

Public Comments (14,656)
1 hour ago
Carl T. from Baton Rouge, LA writes:
Quotation mark icon
The child support is based on overtime work hours that I'm not promised to make and gross pay. We live off net pay. It should be based on what I make 90% of the time which is a 40 hr work week.
Jul 19th at 10:27 pm
Someone from Fremont, CA writes:
Quotation mark icon
Not every situation is like this. It sounds like you are not thinking about the best interest of the child involved.
Jul 19th at 10:26 pm
Someone from Fremont, CA writes:
Quotation mark icon
Not every situation is like this. It sounds like you are not thinking about the best interest of the child involved.
Jul 19th at 10:26 pm
Someone from Fremont, CA writes:
Quotation mark icon
Not every situation is like this. It sounds like you are not thinking about the best interest of the child involved.
Jul 19th at 10:26 pm
Erin S. from Fremont, CA writes:
Quotation mark icon
Not every situation is like this. It sounds like you are not thinking about the best interest of the child involved.
1 day ago
Someone from Somerset, PA writes:
Quotation mark icon
I believe child support should only benifit untill 5 yrs also they should take these mother's that free load the system and make them work in order to get support ..they were part in making the child they should have to show support on their behalf also in which they are supporting the child .not have kids just to support them selfs ..I can almost bet you that the child most of the time don't even benifit out of the support anyways ....the father is paying the child support and also buying the stuff the child needs and the woman are out living on a high life ..on the support the father is paying for the child ...
Jul 14th, 2017
Someone from Murfreesboro, TN writes:
Quotation mark icon
Face the fact, you know Child Support is a scam. You created it to be so, look at the statistics on why so many low income fathers leave, why so many African American fathers flee. Because you aren't caring about the family at all. It does not cost hundreds of dollars a month to pay for a child. Children do not need TVs, extra shoes, or any of the other superficial things you've decided are alright for mothers to spend on. Children are getting fatter, it's factual. So food is also not as much as necessity as previously thought. Medical insurance? Please, that's 200 dollars right there alone. Child support should never, never be as much as a monthly rent or house payment. You should not be paying for the woman to live an easier life, you should be paying literally to keep your child alive. That's your only responsibility. 18 years of paying 500+ dollars every month? That's more than enough to buy a house. You're flat out evil, what you're doing is evil. Child support should be a flat fee, everyone pays it and the government sends the resources to your home every month. They will drop off some clothes that fit your child, they will give you an EBT so you can buy food. The women of this country need to get off their ****ing lazy asses and start providing for their own damn kids. Also, what is this ******** about a man's child support going up if the woman has another child? The whore should have kept her legs closed. In fact the support should go down, because she obviously doesn't care about her first child.
Jul 14th, 2017
Someone from Murfreesboro, TN writes:
Quotation mark icon
Face the fact, you know Child Support is a scam. You created it to be so, look at the statistics on why so many low income fathers leave, why so many African American fathers flee. Because you aren't caring about the family at all. It does not cost hundreds of dollars a month to pay for a child. Children do not need TVs, extra shoes, or any of the other superficial things you've decided are alright for mothers to spend on. Children are getting fatter, it's factual. So food is also not as much as necessity as previously thought. Medical insurance? Please, that's 200 dollars right there alone. Child support should never, never be as much as a monthly rent or house payment. You should not be paying for the woman to live an easier life, you should be paying literally to keep your child alive. That's your only responsibility. 18 years of paying 500+ dollars every month? That's more than enough to buy a house. You're flat out evil, what you're doing is evil. Child support should be a flat fee, everyone pays it and the government sends the resources to your home every month. They will drop off some clothes that fit your child, they will give you an EBT so you can buy food. The women of this country need to get off their ****ing lazy asses and start providing for their own damn kids. Also, what is this ******** about a man's child support going up if the woman has another child? The whore should have kept her legs closed. In fact the support should go down, because she obviously doesn't care about her first child.
Jul 10th, 2017
Guillermo G. from La Puente, CA signed.
Jul 10th, 2017
Antonio M. from Sacramento, CA writes:
Quotation mark icon
the child support law needs to change. period.