MORE FUNDING & SUPPORT FOR PRO-SE IN THE US COURT
HOW MANY OF YOU CAN PAY $200 PER HOUR FOR AN ATTORNEY? IF YOU CAN'T, YOU MUST BE PRO-SE FACING A DISADVANTAGE IN THE COURT!
HOW MANY OF US CAN AFFORD TO PAY $7000 DOWN PAYMENT AND $200 PER HOUR TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY? IF WE CAN'T, WE MUST BE PRO-SE, FIGHTING ALL ALONE AGAINST A PROFESSIONAL LAWYER IN THE COURT. THE COURT IS NOT ALWAYS FAIR. THE JUDGES MUST BE IMPARTIAL BUT ARE NOT REALLY, NOT ALWAYS. THE JUDGES CAN BE PREJUDICED BASED ON FAVORITISM AND/OR POSSIBLE BRIBERY. WE HAVE ENOUGH GOOD CAUSE TO WIN AND COMPLY WITH THE COURT RULES CAREFULLY. BUT THE JUDGE MISUSES OR ABUSES HIS/HER DISCRETION AGAINST US. THE JUDGES KNOW WELL IT'S NOT EASY TO APPEAL FOR PRO-SE. WHAT CAN PRO-SE DO, HOW CAN PRO-SE WIN IN THE COURT,IF THE JUDGES PROCEED THE CASE OUTRAGEOUSLY AND UNFAIRLY? WE ARE AT AN AUTOMATIC DISADVANTAGE WITHOUT A LAWYER, THOUGH IT IS OUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO HAVE AN IMPARTIAL TRIAL WITH OR WITHOUT ONE.
THERE MUST BE MORE CASE REVIEWING AGENCY TO INVESTIGATE POSSIBLE CORRUPTION CASES AND MORE FUNDING AND SUPPORT FOR PRO-SE TO ENSURE FAIRNESS IN THE COURT AND INCREASE THE PUBLIC CONFIDENCE TO THE US COURT SYSTEM. I AM SURE THAT CONGRESS WILL SUPPORT THIS POSITION AND IT IS A MOST NECESSARY CHANGE IN THE CURRENT SYSTEM.
THERE MUST BE MORE CASE REVIEWING AGENCY TO INVESTIGATE POSSIBLE CORRUPTION CASES AND MORE FUNDING AND SUPPORT FOR PRO-SE TO ENSURE FAIRNESS IN THE COURT AND INCREASE THE PUBLIC CONFIDENCE TO THE US COURT SYSTEM. I AM SURE THAT CONGRESS WILL SUPPORT THIS POSITION AND IT IS A MOST NECESSARY CHANGE IN THE CURRENT SYSTEM.
View Comments