Share:

Liberty and Freedom over H.R.3261

Don't allow the few to dictate the voice of the many.

This bill, while intended to protect copyright holders, allows the ability to censor free speech. Even advocates for the Bill agree to this as stated by Floyd Abrams, a paid advocate for supporters of the bill, admits SOPA would censor protected speech. In a letter sent to House Judiciary Chairman Lamar Smith and Ranking Member John Conyers, Abrams writes:



"Regardless of the particular standard or definition of foreign infringing sites, court-approved remedies under the Stop Online Piracy Act may result in the blockage or disruption of some protected speech. As discussed above, the bill provides a range of injunctive relief..., with a court making the final determination as to whether and how to craft relief against a website operator or owner or third party intermediaries. When injunctive relief includes blocking domain names, the blockage of non-infringing or protected content may result." (Source: Techdirt.com)



And while I agree online piracy is indeed a serious problem that needs to be addressed, the excessive and invasive measures contained in SOPA are simply the wrong approach. The bill would unduly and randomly grant content owners the power of censorship.



We the People stand against this Bill along with Google, Facebook and the many other social sites we support and that are part of our lives and businesses.