Investigate Ninth Circuit Judicial Corruption - Prosecute former judge Alex Kozinski
Verifiable Factual Evidence on Record shows: On Nov. 24, 2014 - former judge Alex Kozinski issued two "false statements" on his Order of Dismissal and concealed all the evidence presented with a Complaint of Judicial Misconduct filed against U.S. District judge Susan Y. Illston (Ninth Cir. No. 13-90201) alleging a "fraud on the court" that shows: on Aug. 2, 1996, Nov. 19, 1996 and on May 14, 1997 judge Illston knowingly issued three "false statements" on her Orders that willfully "misrepresents a material fact" on a "Key" and crucial document dated Dec. 2, 1991. The Document is a Complaint seeking a warrant that was never signed or issued to establish "probable cause" of a public offense. Fact - [N]o criminal charges were ever filed by the State to invoke the jurisdiction of the courts and justify a misdemeanor DUI conviction, this fact amounts to a judicial "Usurpation of Power" in conspiracy with the State and its agents on Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Record shows: Intentional action was taken by judge Illston to prevent further Review of the fraud committed. See: Ninth Cir. No. 12-15938 - USDC No. 3:95-cv-01248-SI. The habeas case is related to a pending 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983 case, Ninth Cir. No. 95-17267 -USDC No. 3:95-cv-01613-SI, where Calif. state judges and other "officers of the court" are named as defendants. On Sep. 29, 2015 Chief judge Sidney R. Thomas and nine Judicial Council members Affirmed the Order of Dismissal issued by judge Kozinski. Fact - Each Council member was informed that judge Kozinski had concealed all the evidence presented with the Complaint and had issued two "false statements." Record shows: Ninth Circuit judges knowingly violated Article III sec. 2 of the U.S. Constitution "Cases" and "Controversies" requirement in the habeas case. This proves how easy it is to abuse power and how judges cover up for one another. Reform is needed to change this. The victim Mr. Rodriguez has been denied "Due Process of Law" for 26 years. Its time for accountability.
View Comments