Impeach U.S. District Court Judge Susan Y. Illston and prosecute former judge Alex Kozinski

Impeachment is warranted - for committing an "Official Act" consistent with "Bribery" and perpetrating a "Fraud on the Court" in conspiracy with the State and its agents affecting the plaintiff's pending 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983 case, Ninth Cir. No. 95-17267 - USDC No. 3:95-cv-01613-SI. Verifiable Factual Evidence on record shows: a judicial "Usurpation of Power" on a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus case, Ninth Cir. No. 12-15938 - USDC No. 3:95-cv-01248-SI. The record shows: on Aug. 2, 1996, on Nov. 19, 1996 and on May 14, 1997 judge Illston knowingly acted with deliberate indifference when she issued three "false statements" on her Orders that intentionally distorts the "Truth" and willfully "misrepresents a material fact" on a "Key" and crucial document dated Dec. 2, 1991. The document is a complaint seeking a warrant that was never signed or issued to establish "probable cause" of a public offense. Facts - On June 16, 1991 two "Notice to Appear" traffic citations were issued by the CHP for an alleged DUI. On Oct. 3, 1991 the DMV issued an "Order of Set Aside." On May 7, 1993 Mr. Rodriguez was convicted. [N]o criminal charges were filed to invoke the jurisdiction of the courts. The State side-stepped the judicial process. An Investigation will reveal: Ninth Circuit judges knowingly violated Article III sec. 2 of the U.S. Constitution "Cases" and "Controversies" requirement and became willful participants in joint activity with the State and its agents to conceal a "fraud on the court" in the habeas case. Fact - Federal judges side-stepped the judicial process and forfeited the protection of the law. Record shows: on Nov. 24, 2014 former Ninth Circuit Chief judge Alex Kozinski knowingly issued two false statements and concealed all the evidence presented that proves a "fraud on the court" when a Complaint of Judicial Misconduct was filed against judge Illston. See: Ninth Cir. Complaint No. 13-90201. On Sep. 29, 2015 Ninth Circuit Chief judge Sidney R. Thomas Affirmed the Dismissal of the Complaint issued by judge Kozinski. Fact -Mr. Rodriguez has been denied "Due Process of Law" for the last 26 years in this ongoing conspiracy to conceal a State "fraud on the court" where California citizens were intentionally deceived to find an innocent person guilty in a malicious prosecution. Mr. Rodriguez is seeking justice for "Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law." Thank you and God bless America,

Alvaro C. Rodriguez - Retired Bus Driver with AC Transit 32 years of public service.

Take Action! First, Enter Your ZIP Code


Public Comments (1)
Dec 6th, 2018
Alvaro C. from San Leandro, CA writes:
Quotation mark icon
On June 22, 2016 a Motion to Recall a Ninth Circuit Mandate for Fraud on the Court pursuant to FRCP Rule 60 (d) (3) was filed in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals by pro se Petitioner Alvaro C. Rodriguez - The court later claimed the habeas case is closed and there was a paper filing deficiency. Fact -The Ninth Circuit was informed that new discovered evidence shows: District Court Judge Susan Illston and former Ninth Circuit Chief judge Alex Kozinski falsified, concealed and covered up a material fact for California state judges named as defendants in a pending 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983 case which is related to the habeas case. On May 15, 2018 a six page "Letter to Alert" the Judicial Council of the Ninth Circuit of a "Fraud on the Court" affecting the plaintiff's sec. 1983 case as shown above was filed in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Exhibits of Evidence A through H were presented and filed with the "Letter to Alert." The court was informed that Ninth Circuit judges were being accused of conspiring to conceal a "fraud on the court" and was informed of the "Official Act" consistent with "Bribery" amounting to a judicial "Usurpation of Power."

(c) Petition2Congress, all rights reserved. For web site support: email info@rallycongress.com or call (202) 600-8357