Share:

Expansion of the Helping American Victims Afflicted by Neurological Attacks Act of 2021

(Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation, Part 1) tisfightback.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Microwave-Harassment-Mind-Control-Experimentation.pdf?fbclid=IwAR3UcqKa9iP0LpYTFtPH06xQYEtlFAnGD737PrsFiKwjOr-c79V0ReCrgDs
(Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation, Part 2) https://www.subgenius.com/bigfist/answers/articles/X0038_Microwave_Harassment.html?fbclid=IwAR3NfAZcFHCeuLg7XT-aKgrexzkKCPIiQeLORqDCBNCw8UEAP1lNBOz4MSA
Here we have the military and intelligence community admitting to all of the serious human rights abuses victims and targets describe. Other counterintelligence agents or persons are also involved. It's not a conspiracy theory. The Helping American Victims Afflicted by Neurological Attacks Act of 2021 or the HAVANA (Syndrome) Act of 2021, govtrack.us/congress/bills/117/s1828 which pays damages to the CIA and State Department, needs to be amended to include all of the other survivors and their families in the public domain who can't obtain any type of government redress. They have decimated Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 29, and 30 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. On the positive side, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which was ratified in 1992 has the force of U.S. law under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. The perpetrators would have you believe, moreover, that the problem is limited to the twenty-five people discussed in the above document. To the contrary, the scope of the targeting is nationwide. https://www.targeted-individuals.com/TINumbers Detractors also say, falsely, that the technologies are not harmful. They are. "The term, 'non-lethal,' used to describe this technology is misleading. The energy emitted from all these weapons can kill people when appropriately amplified. At lower levels of amplification, they can cause extreme forms of physical discomfort and debilitation." (Excerpt from the Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation document). Electromagnetic weapons, including high power microwaves, were used during the Gulf War to disrupt and destroy the enemy's electronic systems and were additionally used for anti-personnel purposes. Harmful Neuroweapons (in addition to DEW's, Psychotronic Weapons, and Microwave Weapons) are invasively being used on the public domain without any consent, en masse. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1013&context=spaceanddefense&fbclid=IwAR3qbbDZPSHLdjuUu0w5NBa4OjenKs__eta4l4jB5wZ-0FyZ77CZjs1oHK8 The cyberbullying or cyberstalking problem affects women who are more likely to be victims of reported crimes, high school students who have been documented in the teen suicide problem, and the other thirty percent are men targeted by people for an array of reasons. Demand from your Representatives and Senators that these weapons be immediately retracted from this very high degree of misuse against the public. Shell contractors, subcontractors, along with their main government employers can be held legally accountable under the FTCA (Federal Tort Claims Act). Orlikow v. United States, 682 F.Supp. 77 (District Court, DC 1988). Bringing a case of this type to court is extremely difficult to prove as evidenced by an ex-NSA employee, John St. Clair Akwei. His lawsuit against the agency, http://whale.to/b/akwei.pdf , outlines gross misapplication of mind control technologies against the American public. The government used the technologies to make him stop his case that demonstrates how covert technologies are used to monitor and torture individual citizens. (1:92cv449, AKWEI v. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY). The victims and survivors of the Orlikow case each received $150,000 from an out-of-court settlement after years of litigation with an experienced Public Interest law firm before all of the victims died. The technologies used are typically developed and implemented in secret from private corporations, academia, and the general public and sold or appropriated by the federal government. Congress has the power to overturn an executive order by passing legislation that invalidates it, and can also refuse to provide funding necessary to carry out certain policy measures contained within the order or to legitimize policy mechanisms.
(Copy and paste the above Links)