Ending Intellectual Property
Time is a new time by the time it exists, and because neither your nor the brain are abstracted from time, both you and it are new ones by the time that they exist. Who then is there to either have or to not have thoughts, to produce or to not produce concepts? Why then does intellectual property law exist in the first place? It doesn't even make sense in its own ballpark, because by trying to take credit for a thought, one only ever conjures a concept of that thought but does not repeat the initial thought itself. Intellectual property law confuses the thought of a thought for the initial thought itself and thus negates its own argument by claiming that the former isn't actually movement of its own. If that's to be the nature of a thought and, therefore, of all thought, the original idea referenced then must also not have been movement of its own. As such, what is there to take credit for? Even if all of this were to be denied, intellectual property law still doesn't make sense. Because, if one claims to have had a thought as something other than themselves, then the thought was never within them, the thing that possessed it as an other. If it was never inherently theirs, then they can't claim it as their own simply because they had an experience of it. For one's experience of something doesn't determine whether or not that thing belongs to them. Please support my petition to end intellectual property and to restore a world that moves genuinely. Thank you.
View Comments