Share:

Arizona corruption Pima county sheriff's

This is an unedited version I hope you are able to follow phone number 574-318-5849 there are a few misspellings it's kind of jumps around a little bit but this is a rough draft of what will be forthcoming of the final copy
Jul 25th, 2018 Cassondra G. from Tucson, AZ writes:
Quotation mark icon
Hide quoted text On Jun 26, 2018 5:36 PM, Cassondra Marie wrote: On Jun 6, 2018 2:43 PM, Cassondra wrote: To whom it may concern my name is Cassandra Marie Lowery I am writing in regards to putting the attorney for the Sheriff's Department I notice that I have an intent to Sue and or seek judgement I also would like an investigation brought up against the Pima County Sheriff's Department I was a victim of domestic violence my daughter April Marie Gilliam was a victim as well dr. David Alan Rubin 4327 North Osage Drive the police were dispatched there on multiple occasions where I was the victim every time on the 1st dispatch my child April Marie Gilliam had called nine-one-one well on the phone with 911 assaulted her in the middle of assaulting me another occasion I was a victim once again and it was a recorded video of him assaulting me Pima County Sheriff's Department has failed to file any charges against dr. David Rubin they have revictimized me I am being subject to a criminal case for being a victim they are giving preferential treatment to dr. Rubin it must be because he has money in his running for US Senate so women children minorities and victims of domestic violence must not matter and according to the pattern that they have set forth in my case victims women and children are minorities must not be entitled to any kind of protection from law enforcement I have some email from Mayor Rothschild which I will be forwarding over to you my understanding of the law is that as long as one officials in an elected office has a call of action for an investigation itmeet the legal guidelines for an investigation brought up against the County and or public office she also must be investigated and it must be follow through if you have any questions my phone number is 574-318-1792 if I'm unreachable on that phone number I have a message phone 574-401-0374 I'm asking that immediate attention be brought to said matter I would also like to state that any district attorney City attorney law enforcement officials judge magistrate elected officials County city or state employee Sheriff's Department City Police Department County official or officer any state county official employee or officer who is aware of these in justices and allows for this to continue is no longer immune from prosecution and once they become aware of this they have to report it to a higher Federal Authority or a federal judge which would then render them a federal witness not in Witness Protection please if you could get back to me that would be wonderful don't forget I will be forwarding the emails from the mayor sincerely Cassandra Lowry my preferred method of contact t is through my phone number 574-318-1792 or 574 401-0374 I also prefer to receive any and all copies through postal mail my address has changed since I was thrown out of my home arrestednot to mention assaulted by the Sheriff's Department in my home which doctor rubinstein-taybi wholesale transfer agreement which I recorded with the courts with my complaint when I obtained a protective order which I believe still hasn't been served to him that would have been the first week of March it's June honey my address is 2432 North Balboa Avenue apartment 14 Tucson Arizona 85705 well I am displaced this will be my current address until some kind of closure I hope you all have a very blessed day : Michael Silva; Mike Rankin Subject: Re: Due process violations I have forwarded your note to the Police Chief’s Chief of Staff and City Attorney for review and response. Sent from my iPad On May 1, 2018, at 4:41 PM, Cassondra Marie wrote: To Mayor Rothschild and or whom it may concern, I am writing you in regards to the Pima County courts Sheriff and City Police Department allowing my due process and civil and human rights to be violated. Due to these negligence criminal and unlawful actions that have been perpetrated up on me by the Tucson Police Department Department of Child Safety Pima County Sheriff's the judicial Administration blatant disregard 4 me and my child and our rights as victims women children minorities domestic violence victims gun violence murder crime I must be go and try to get Justice for myself and my daughter and for any other woman or child who has or maybe currently in a situation as such that they are given the same protections that any other human would be entitled to as inherent rights as a human with feelings rights and Freedoms that have been restricted are the courts and the systematic breakdown and disregard for life in the freedom to move around freely without being in fear of state or government interference that our leaders Supreme Court senators and congressman that they would stand up speak out and enforce the loss and protect the community in which they serve My arrest on December 19th 2017 was dismissed due to the fact there were no formal charges as well as the driving on suspended was dismissed there's a standing order to dismiss there was no criminal charges there was no reports and I was wrongfully detained because I fit the description of a woman who had tattoos on her back chest and abdomen which I clearly have none of the above and the law states that a person fitting the description is not justification for detention. They said that the description that I fit was of a woman woman who robbed or shoplifted some weeks prior or days prior I'm unsure of when the alleged criminal activity had taken place due to the fact that it wasn't me and I have knowledge of After being held in the back of the police car for almost two hours handcuffed but I'm told I'm not under arrest yet 2 hours later I am still handcuffed in the back of a police cruiser which is clearly a violation of arrest and detention laws it is clearly an unreasonable time to be restrained and or prohibited from moving freely and or being able to leave the scene and discontinue contact with the police authorities. Even though the earlier Court in January had made a ruling which dismissed any and or all charges including driving on suspended were dismissed due to the fact there are no criminal charges I was still placed on pretrial services if there's no charge they are dismissed why was I threatened and coerced into and agreements that allowed me to be monitored and placed under restrictions by the state and the judge States I could be subject to arrest if I fail to adhere to these restrictions which are clearly unlawful violating my rights. I should not be subject to unlawful monitoring I feel like I was being harassed and threatened with negative adverse actions that could have long-term detrimental negative effects on my life this being in due to the fact that the unlawful monitoring of my behaviors and movements that I was being forced into adhering to the monitoring by the judge and or Criminal Courts the defendant would only be subject to the authorization if the defendant were out on bond and charged with a crime. It is my understanding that dismissal of a charge means that the defendant has been cleared and any negative restrictions and monitor ization of the defendants is no longer applicable and any continuation of such is in violation of the defendants inherent rights as a human being. After December I was once again and Court and being subject to these charges in January where is rolling on these charges was already made and ordered judge's order dismissed with a standing order to dismiss due to the fact that there were no criminal charges they did this with prosecutorial discretion which is clearly different then with or without prejudice prosecutorial discretion is it safe guard for the prosecutor it allows the plea and offers protection to the prosecutor especially if there was an unlawful arrest and improper investigative procedures. I am now facing and unlawful trial that is forcing me well attempting to force me to unwanted Medical Practice it is delaying my speedy trial and is a violation once again of my civil and human rights. I am also with the understanding that a rule 11 hearing has to be justified by a reasonable incompetence and history or proof of such mental infliction . My public Pretender is attempting to force me into medical procedures because she public feels I am in need of a competency hearing her reasons being due to the fact that I exercise my rights argue with her and ask her to work on my be half and ask her to file motions and to examine the evidence and and give me a defense that is working for me not the prosecutor the lawyer public Pretender I should say says I am disruptive during court proceedings so I must need a rule 11 hearing my understanding is that is not justification and does not make me in need of a competency hearing or medical review it makes me a human who has rights a human who has the right and the ability to speak on my own behalf and the right to vocalize my thoughts feelings and allow me to be free vocalize my disdain and distrust in law enforcement agencies. I I'm only asking that the officials who are enforcing the law follow the same color of the law we the public has to follow. I am very colorful and verbal when it comes my vocabulary to law enforcement agencies and administrative law judges and or prosecutors. You will have to understand that I am an individual who has been subject to negative an unlawful acts.. I have very little Trust in the Pima County judicial process due to the fact that I feel it has systematically failed to protect me on multiple occasions as well as unlawful detention of me as a person who has been subject of the sentence have 2 many violations that have occurred over a 10-year period of time. The first Contact I had with Pima County judge and or law enforcement agencies was in 200 7 it was in December I believe the first week I am unclear as to the events that surrounded this arrest due to the fact that I cardiac arrested while in custody of the Pima County Sheriff's department at the Pima County jail and while I was detained and in custody of pima jail in December of 2007 I was placing Intensive Care Unit where I was in a coma and on a ventilator at such time they failed to notify my mom or any other family that I was in a coma and able to breathe on a ventilator due to the cardiac cardiac arrest. The original Bonds that being the reason for arrest came from the state of Indiana and after being released from hospital and placed in the Pima County Jail a gentleman had obtained a bond for me I'm unsure of the circumstances surrounding it but the bail bondsman that they no longer wanted to be on the bond which came out of Indiana and as a result of this Aztec Bail Bonds revoke my bond and had a peanut County Arizona judge and Indiana Bond meaning Indiana and their court system have to be the agency and State with a judge from that state which my understanding is that Pima County could not have revoked that Bond only Indiana administrative law judge would have been able to revoke the bond. That being said I was then bonded out a second time by a bail bondsman of Arizona I'm not sure how long after a couple days maybe a week he decided he no longer wants to be on the Bond. Arizona bail bondsman out of Phoenix had a federal Marshal whose Moonlighting as a bounty hunter came to Tucson and with Direction of the bondsman the Bounty Hunter came to my place of employment supervisor and visitors or patrons of the establishment I was very embarrassed. Upon arrival at the Pima County Jail the Sergeants on duty advised the Bounty Hunter That his warrant to arrest me was not signed by a judge and instead of releasing me he took me to a motel where he kept me handcuffed change to the bed overnight until the next morning when he had me accompany him to the courthouse and after going to rest me send once again this was an Indiana Bond. there's the obvious justification for feelings of mistrust and fear of unlawful detention and kidnapping due to the criminal misconduct of the police department Sheriff's Department and bonding agencies that are the cause and reason 4 the negative thoughts and feelings I have towards the police and the administrative law offices in the City of Tucson.. my child was unlawfully detained and kidnapped by the Department of Child Services in 2017 I had only been in the state of Arizona for a week and a half when a woman called me from an anonymous phone number asking me where me and my child she said she received a report from the state of Indiana the report came from several months prior and a man I had a restraining order against due to domestic violence my husband was murdered and I came to the State of Arizona to be with my mom in hopes of A better future for my child and I whether it be in Arizona California Texas or Indiana I was doing what I felt to be a step towards a better life for my child and I hoping that some of the negative memories could be overcome with more joyous memories 574-401-0374 I hope that this is not too hard to follow and you take into consideration me and any others who may be subject to the same and justices. Cassondra Gillam Flag Comment
Jul 25th, 2018 Cassondra G. from Tucson, AZ writes:
Quotation mark icon
Hide quoted text On Jun 26, 2018 5:36 PM, Cassondra Marie wrote: On Jun 6, 2018 2:43 PM, Cassondra wrote: To whom it may concern my name is Cassandra Marie Lowery I am writing in regards to putting the attorney for the Sheriff's Department I notice that I have an intent to Sue and or seek judgement I also would like an investigation brought up against the Pima County Sheriff's Department I was a victim of domestic violence my daughter April Marie Gilliam was a victim as well dr. David Alan Rubin 4327 North Osage Drive the police were dispatched there on multiple occasions where I was the victim every time on the 1st dispatch my child April Marie Gilliam had called nine-one-one well on the phone with 911 assaulted her in the middle of assaulting me another occasion I was a victim once again and it was a recorded video of him assaulting me Pima County Sheriff's Department has failed to file any charges against dr. David Rubin they have revictimized me I am being subject to a criminal case for being a victim they are giving preferential treatment to dr. Rubin it must be because he has money in his running for US Senate so women children minorities and victims of domestic violence must not matter and according to the pattern that they have set forth in my case victims women and children are minorities must not be entitled to any kind of protection from law enforcement I have some email from Mayor Rothschild which I will be forwarding over to you my understanding of the law is that as long as one officials in an elected office has a call of action for an investigation itmeet the legal guidelines for an investigation brought up against the County and or public office she also must be investigated and it must be follow through if you have any questions my phone number is 574-318-1792 if I'm unreachable on that phone number I have a message phone 574-401-0374 I'm asking that immediate attention be brought to said matter I would also like to state that any district attorney City attorney law enforcement officials judge magistrate elected officials County city or state employee Sheriff's Department City Police Department County official or officer any state county official employee or officer who is aware of these in justices and allows for this to continue is no longer immune from prosecution and once they become aware of this they have to report it to a higher Federal Authority or a federal judge which would then render them a federal witness not in Witness Protection please if you could get back to me that would be wonderful don't forget I will be forwarding the emails from the mayor sincerely Cassandra Lowry my preferred method of contact t is through my phone number 574-3185849 or 574 401-0374 I also prefer to receive any and all copies through postal mail my address has changed since I was thrown out of my home arrestednot to mention assaulted by the Sheriff's Department in my home which doctor rubinstein-taybi wholesale transfer agreement which I recorded with the courts with my complaint when I obtained a protective order which I believe still hasn't been served to him that would have been the first week of March it's June honey my address is 2432 North Balboa Avenue apartment 14 Tucson Arizona 85705 well I am displaced this will be my current address until some kind of closure I hope you all have a very blessed day : Michael Silva; Mike Rankin Subject: Re: Due process violations I have forwarded your note to the Police Chief’s Chief of Staff and City Attorney for review and response. Sent from my iPad On May 1, 2018, at 4:41 PM, Cassondra Marie wrote: To Mayor Rothschild and or whom it may concern, I am writing you in regards to the Pima County courts Sheriff and City Police Department allowing my due process and civil and human rights to be violated. Due to these negligence criminal and unlawful actions that have been perpetrated up on me by the Tucson Police Department Department of Child Safety Pima County Sheriff's the judicial Administration blatant disregard 4 me and my child and our rights as victims women children minorities domestic violence victims gun violence murder crime I must be go and try to get Justice for myself and my daughter and for any other woman or child who has or maybe currently in a situation as such that they are given the same protections that any other human would be entitled to as inherent rights as a human with feelings rights and Freedoms that have been restricted are the courts and the systematic breakdown and disregard for life in the freedom to move around freely without being in fear of state or government interference that our leaders Supreme Court senators and congressman that they would stand up speak out and enforce the loss and protect the community in which they serve My arrest on December 19th 2017 was dismissed due to the fact there were no formal charges as well as the driving on suspended was dismissed there's a standing order to dismiss there was no criminal charges there was no reports and I was wrongfully detained because I fit the description of a woman who had tattoos on her back chest and abdomen which I clearly have none of the above and the law states that a person fitting the description is not justification for detention. They said that the description that I fit was of a woman woman who robbed or shoplifted some weeks prior or days prior I'm unsure of when the alleged criminal activity had taken place due to the fact that it wasn't me and I have knowledge of After being held in the back of the police car for almost two hours handcuffed but I'm told I'm not under arrest yet 2 hours later I am still handcuffed in the back of a police cruiser which is clearly a violation of arrest and detention laws it is clearly an unreasonable time to be restrained and or prohibited from moving freely and or being able to leave the scene and discontinue contact with the police authorities. Even though the earlier Court in January had made a ruling which dismissed any and or all charges including driving on suspended were dismissed due to the fact there are no criminal charges I was still placed on pretrial services if there's no charge they are dismissed why was I threatened and coerced into and agreements that allowed me to be monitored and placed under restrictions by the state and the judge States I could be subject to arrest if I fail to adhere to these restrictions which are clearly unlawful violating my rights. I should not be subject to unlawful monitoring I feel like I was being harassed and threatened with negative adverse actions that could have long-term detrimental negative effects on my life this being in due to the fact that the unlawful monitoring of my behaviors and movements that I was being forced into adhering to the monitoring by the judge and or Criminal Courts the defendant would only be subject to the authorization if the defendant were out on bond and charged with a crime. It is my understanding that dismissal of a charge means that the defendant has been cleared and any negative restrictions and monitor ization of the defendants is no longer applicable and any continuation of such is in violation of the defendants inherent rights as a human being. After December I was once again and Court and being subject to these charges in January where is rolling on these charges was already made and ordered judge's order dismissed with a standing order to dismiss due to the fact that there were no criminal charges they did this with prosecutorial discretion which is clearly different then with or without prejudice prosecutorial discretion is it safe guard for the prosecutor it allows the plea and offers protection to the prosecutor especially if there was an unlawful arrest and improper investigative procedures. I am now facing and unlawful trial that is forcing me well attempting to force me to unwanted Medical Practice it is delaying my speedy trial and is a violation once again of my civil and human rights. I am also with the understanding that a rule 11 hearing has to be justified by a reasonable incompetence and history or proof of such mental infliction . My public Pretender is attempting to force me into medical procedures because she public feels I am in need of a competency hearing her reasons being due to the fact that I exercise my rights argue with her and ask her to work on my be half and ask her to file motions and to examine the evidence and and give me a defense that is working for me not the prosecutor the lawyer public Pretender I should say says I am disruptive during court proceedings so I must need a rule 11 hearing my understanding is that is not justification and does not make me in need of a competency hearing or medical review it makes me a human who has rights a human who has the right and the ability to speak on my own behalf and the right to vocalize my thoughts feelings and allow me to be free vocalize my disdain and distrust in law enforcement agencies. I I'm only asking that the officials who are enforcing the law follow the same color of the law we the public has to follow. I am very colorful and verbal when it comes my vocabulary to law enforcement agencies and administrative law judges and or prosecutors. You will have to understand that I am an individual who has been subject to negative an unlawful acts.. I have very little Trust in the Pima County judicial process due to the fact that I feel it has systematically failed to protect me on multiple occasions as well as unlawful detention of me as a person who has been subject of the sentence have 2 many violations that have occurred over a 10-year period of time. The first Contact I had with Pima County judge and or law enforcement agencies was in 200 7 it was in December I believe the first week I am unclear as to the events that surrounded this arrest due to the fact that I cardiac arrested while in custody of the Pima County Sheriff's department at the Pima County jail and while I was detained and in custody of pima jail in December of 2007 I was placing Intensive Care Unit where I was in a coma and on a ventilator at such time they failed to notify my mom or any other family that I was in a coma and able to breathe on a ventilator due to the cardiac cardiac arrest. The original Bonds that being the reason for arrest came from the state of Indiana and after being released from hospital and placed in the Pima County Jail a gentleman had obtained a bond for me I'm unsure of the circumstances surrounding it but the bail bondsman that they no longer wanted to be on the bond which came out of Indiana and as a result of this Aztec Bail Bonds revoke my bond and had a peanut County Arizona judge and Indiana Bond meaning Indiana and their court system have to be the agency and State with a judge from that state which my understanding is that Pima County could not have revoked that Bond only Indiana administrative law judge would have been able to revoke the bond. That being said I was then bonded out a second time by a bail bondsman of Arizona I'm not sure how long after a couple days maybe a week he decided he no longer wants to be on the Bond. Arizona bail bondsman out of Phoenix had a federal Marshal whose Moonlighting as a bounty hunter came to Tucson and with Direction of the bondsman the Bounty Hunter came to my place of employment supervisor and visitors or patrons of the establishment I was very embarrassed. Upon arrival at the Pima County Jail the Sergeants on duty advised the Bounty Hunter That his warrant to arrest me was not signed by a judge and instead of releasing me he took me to a motel where he kept me handcuffed change to the bed overnight until the next morning when he had me accompany him to the courthouse and after going to rest me send once again this was an Indiana Bond. there's the obvious justification for feelings of mistrust and fear of unlawful detention and kidnapping due to the criminal misconduct of the police department Sheriff's Department and bonding agencies that are the cause and reason 4 the negative thoughts and feelings I have towards the police and the administrative law offices in the City of Tucson.. my child was unlawfully detained and kidnapped by the Department of Child Services in 2017 I had only been in the state of Arizona for a week and a half when a woman called me from an anonymous phone number asking me where me and my child she said she received a report from the state of Indiana the report came from several months prior and a man I had a restraining order against due to domestic violence my husband was murdered and I came to the State of Arizona to be with my mom in hopes of A better future for my child and I whether it be in Arizona California Texas or Indiana I was doing what I felt to be a step towards a better life for my child and I hoping that some of the negative memories could be overcome with more joyous memories 5743185849-I hope that this is not too hard to follow and you take into consideration me and any others who may be subject to the same and justices. Cassondra Gillam