Oppose the Elimination of NSF Funding for Political Science Research in HR 933
Public Comments (1,328)
-
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Everett, WA signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from New York, NY signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Mcminnville, OR signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Charlottesville, VA signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from La Jolla, CA signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from New Haven, CT signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Madison, NJ signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Chapel Hill, NC signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Etna, NH signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Tucson, AZ signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Springfield, OR signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Eugene, OR signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Berkeley, CA signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Decatur, GA signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Davis, CA signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Leonardo, NJ writes:
As a political science graduate student, I can attest to the tremendous importance of having NSF funding for political science. My future job and that of many others that I know will rely on this funding. Not to mention, the U.S. government has benefited enormously from political science research. To cut funding now seems misguided given the importance of a well-functioning government these days.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelMar 20th, 2013Someone from Houston, TX signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Austin, TX signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Eugene, OR signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Austin, TX signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Mission, KS signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Chicago, IL signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Lawrence, KS signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from San Francisco, CA signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Kansas City, MO signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Los Angeles, CA signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Eugene, OR signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Brookings, SD signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Murray, KY signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Cincinnati, OH signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Leonardo, NJ signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Rialto, CA signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from New York, NY signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Chapel Hill, NC signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Stanford, CA signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Madison, WI writes:
Federal denial of support for studies examining questions outside of security and economic interests clearly articulates that it is not important to understand how lawmakers behave, what the public knows, whether policies work, and so forth. It also is likely to stifle research in areas not related to security and economic interests - since much of what we know about those two topics sprang from investigations about other ones, the amendment actually makes achieving it's own misguided goals less likely.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelMar 20th, 2013Someone from Austin, TX writes:
Studying government, politics, and public policy is essential if we are to avoid serious policy errors.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelMar 20th, 2013Someone from Williamsburg, VA signed.
Mar 20th, 2013Someone from Dexter, MI writes:
This amendment is incredibly foolish and I am saddened that it is even being considered.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, Cancel
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.