Join Occupy the SEC in Opposing the Repeal of the Dodd-Frank Act
Public Comments (81)
-
Jun 11th, 2017Elizabeth L. from Grand Junction, CO signed.
Jun 8th, 2017Donelle M. from Chehalis, WA signed.
Feb 19th, 2017Someone from Charlotte, NC signed.
Feb 9th, 2017Chase M. from Alameda, CA writes:
The Financial Choice Act would strip power away from Americans and give banks the freedom to take all the risks while taxpayers will pay for the damage. This is a money grab legislation for big banks and very dangerous to the health of our economy and only a benefit to the 1%.Feb 4th, 2017Someone from Fort Worth, TX signed.
Nov 30th, 2016Someone from Laramie, WY signed.
Nov 16th, 2016Patricia B. from Phoenix, AZ signed.
Nov 10th, 2016Carolyn G. from Austin, TX signed.
Aug 30th, 2016Someone from Lexington, MA signed.
Aug 30th, 2016Someone from Cambridge, MA signed.
Aug 29th, 2016Someone from Hyannis, MA signed.
Aug 29th, 2016Someone from Cambridge, MA signed.
Aug 29th, 2016Someone from Santa Rosa, CA signed.
Aug 29th, 2016Someone from Liberty, NY signed.
Aug 28th, 2016Someone from Woodbourne, NY signed.
Aug 28th, 2016Someone from Newbury, MA signed.
Aug 28th, 2016Someone from Baltimore, MD signed.
Aug 28th, 2016Someone from Issaquah, WA signed.
Jul 25th, 2016Someone from Bensalem, PA signed.
Jun 27th, 2016Someone from Boston, MA signed.
Jun 26th, 2016Someone from Liberty, NY signed.
Jun 26th, 2016Someone from Peabody, MA signed.
Jun 25th, 2016Someone from New York, NY signed.
Jun 15th, 2016Someone from Raleigh, NC writes:
There is little benefit to the public from the Financial Choice act. The benefits (and short term at that) are focused on the leading financial firms which need to have less influence on policy and the markets, not more.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelJun 12th, 2016Someone from Manchester, CT signed.
Jun 12th, 2016Someone from Albuquerque, NM signed.
Jun 11th, 2016Someone from Mesa, AZ signed.
Jun 11th, 2016Someone from Wiscasset, ME writes:
Dodd-Frank Act must at all costs stay in place, and in the future, re-enact Glass-Steagall Act, "also known as the Banking Act of 1933 (48 Stat. 162), was passed by Congress in 1933 and prohibits commercial banks from engaging in the investment business. It was enacted as an emergency response to the failure of nearly 5,000 banks during the Great Depression." We need this more than ever, for our kids.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelJun 10th, 2016Someone from Harwood Heights, IL signed.
Jun 9th, 2016Someone from San Luis Obispo, CA writes:
The Dodd-Frank Act must remain in place and not repealed. We must also reinstate the Glass-Steagall Act.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelJun 9th, 2016Someone from Charlotte, NC writes:
With our economic reality so skewed to the benefit of the wealthy and so reeking of inequality, Rep. Hensarling's bill is just plain dumb. He and supporters of this ridiculous bill ought to be ashamed. We need MORE regulations of our rampantly profiteering financial industry, not less.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelJun 9th, 2016Someone from Chicago, IL signed.
Jun 9th, 2016Someone from Orlando, FL signed.
Jun 9th, 2016Someone from Brooklyn, NY signed.
Jun 9th, 2016Someone from Naperville, IL signed.
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.