Family Court Corruption and to Abolish Title IV-D Funding from States to have incentives to illegally courtnap children, CPS corruption, judicial corruption
Public Comments (2,346)
-
Jul 11th, 2019Glen B. from Winnemucca, NV writes:
The only way we'll ever change the system is by increasing our numbers. And even then, we need to band together and actually show up to our state congressional hearings. I'm in Nevada, if you're too, look me up and contact me, Glen Baker Winnemucca, I'm not hard to find. There is a lot we can do, we need more people. -
Jul 5th, 2019Joe K. from Bath, PA writes:
It says below 'hide your name'. I have no desire to 'hide my name' or not name my accuser, The Northampton County, PA Domestic Relations Section. What is happening to innocent people is a crime and nothing is being done about it. People are losing their children, their homes, their jobs, and in many cases, their lives. Title IV-D was never enacted into positive law, judges are acting under 'color of law', practicing law from the bench and the collection of Title IV-D funds going to fund the corrupt family court system is in conflict of interest and The Separation of Powers Doctrine is also being violated. Parents are labeled 'non-custodial parents, obligors, and plaintiffs' despite having been charged with no crime, afforded due process, or being given a trial by a jury of their peers. I have contacted my state representative, the ACLU, the National Parents Organization, Judicial Watch and the White House. People are fighting back and winning but not fast enough and not in large enough numbers. This topic needs a national spotlight. It is not about gender, or being a 'deadbeat' parent. It is about what is right and just. It is about decriminalizing simply being a parent. I went from Dad to defendant in 24 hours. My crime? Loving my children despite the fact my narcissistic wife no longer loved me as I no longer served her purpose or would put up with her constant negligence towards being a responsible adult. Simply, I want the government out of my pocket and out of my life. You weren't at my wedding. Why are you at my divorce?REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, Cancel -
Jun 16th, 2019Anne L. from Accord, NY writes:
The only thing necessary for evil to exist is for good men to do NOTHING.-Edmund Burke If you’re not part of the solution then you are the PROBLEMREPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, Cancel -
Jun 11th, 2019Calvin T. from Dublin, GA writes:
It’s all a scam and it states with the SSN(estate), the federal corporation bribers bribe the states to violate men and women rights for grants. Also learn that the name isn’t you.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, Cancel -
Jun 4th, 2019Sandra S. from Wildwood, NJ writes:
Please our representatives,Step up to the plate and keep families together. They are putting the almighty dollar ahead of our children. And the children have been in a sense brainwashed by Dyfs. Put the Constitution back in ALL the Courts. Preserve the Childrens Rights. Reunifacation of families will preserve what this country is SUPPOSED to be about. ThankyouREPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, Cancel -
May 30th, 2019Someone from Belton, MO writes:
Title IV D of social security act infringes on basic parenting and civil rights and causes a hostile relationship between the parents. It is outdated, improper, unlawful and a conflict of interest in paying states with federal dollars for each child support award. Therefore, upon this precipice citizens are not receiving fair equitable due process of law, no 4th or 14th amendment rights, bias, punitive seperations, and no civil rights. Hence one parent is erased.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, Cancel -
May 6th, 2019Someone from Katy, TX writes:
Title IV D of social security act infringes on basic parenting and civil rights and causes a hostile relationship between custodial and noncustodial parents. This is outdated, unlawful and a conflict of interest in paying states with federal dollars for each child support award. This is a criminal act with no due process rights.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, Cancel -
May 6th, 2019Joe K. from Bath, PA writes:
Petitions don't work. Emailing your politicians doesn't work. Like anything else the only way to do anything about it is to fight and by any means necessary. The corrupt will not be reasoned with. That's why they're corrupt. They have spent a lifetime banking on our ignorance and when we are no longer ignorant then they get hostile and attack us. The injustice has to end. Enough people are aware to make a difference.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, Cancel -
May 6th, 2019Wesley-Keith M. from Newark, NJ writes:
I REFUSE to pay the state for something that GOD gave me naturally!!!!REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, Cancel -
May 5th, 2019Craig K. from Edgerton, WI writes:
Parent Alienating should be considered a crime and I have lost my son due to this after 6 years of the court system failing and not believing a single word of mine, wish something would happen to the bias judge and GALREPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, Cancel -
Apr 30th, 2019Jennifer M. from Mount Vernon, WA signed.
Apr 30th, 2019Jennifer M. from Puyallup, WA writes:
Child support has ruined our life. My husband is the custodial parent and primary residential parent. Dcs has attacked us and garnished my husband's wages over the absent parent in custodial interference. They are also reporting him as non payment duevtovholding funds because mother shouldn't have the child. So my husband will now lose his job and everything we have over them making up their own rules. They threw all superior court dox in the trash stating they had no authority of DCS. They are forcing us to exhaust every last dime to stop them. They make up their own laws and punish the father's. My husband raised his son for 8 yrs with nothing from the mother. Then the mother takes the child, is found in contempt, and she gets 45% if our income while DCS sets a new standard to allow child abduction for financial gain to get federal funding. We can't afford an attorney now. Yet my husband being the sole custodial parent holds no merit even with superior court documents. This is sexist. We are in Washington state where even mother's who are criminals, abduct children, and lie can get support even tho the courts say otherwise. All they need is a DCS case worker looking for a raise. Pathetic.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelApr 29th, 2019Debra J. from Cleveland, TX signed.
Apr 29th, 2019Glenn S. from Brookhaven, NY writes:
A HUMANITARIAN crisis. They steal your children, and they make you pay for it. CRIMINALIZING you for doing nothing!REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelApr 29th, 2019Glenn S. from Brookhaven, NY writes:
A HUMANITARIAN crisis. They steal your children, and they make you pay for it. CRIMINALIZING you for doing nothing!REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelApr 29th, 2019Glenn S. from Brookhaven, NY writes:
A HUMANITARIAN crisis. They steal your children, and they make you pay for it. CRIMINALIZING you for doing nothing!REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelApr 29th, 2019Glenn S. from Brookhaven, NY writes:
A HUMANITARIAN crisis. They steal your children, and they make you pay for it. CRIMINALIZING you for doing nothing!REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelApr 27th, 2019Ryan N. from Tonawanda, NY writes:
This federal funding of the state has cost 4 of my children the same equal pursuit of happiness as other of their peers. It has stripped then as well as myself of many constitutional rights. My name is RYAN S. NICASTRO i desire to put those responsible in notice of intent to file suit.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelApr 27th, 2019Gerald C. from Greeley, CO writes:
Enforcement crippled my ability to comply. I have paid over 100 K in 9 years while on probation reporting to multiple county PO's at the same time. All the while the judges and news agencies destroyed any credibility to the fact I just wanted to take care and have relationships with the kids I love so much. Thanks for nothing Jefferson County Texas, State of Texas and all the attorney's who took our money and threw us under the busREPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelApr 9th, 2019Someone from Fennville, MI writes:
I live in a state that ranks last in terms of judicial integrity-and I had the additional misfortune of having the worst family court judge in this miserable, deplorable excuse for a state assigned to me. After years of suffering and misery during which she destroyed my family (and almost, but not quite, me) I have just learned that karma is about to deliver a special delivery flaming turd right to her doorstep. Hopefully, the media gets wind of her corruption investigation right soon! Giving these sociopaths immunity turns family courts into dictatorships. Hopefully, this monster in a crow’s outfit will spend the rest of her life rotting in a prison cell. My heart goes out to every parent and child who has suffered at the hands of these corrupt, depraved judges!REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelMar 22nd, 2019Someone from Phillipsburg, NJ writes:
This is so wrong on so many levels, taking children from their parent or parents for financial gain is disgraceful....how can the people who work for these agencies live with themselves?REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelMar 18th, 2019Veronica P. from Tupelo, MS writes:
How can someone make a decision for a child when they have never been a parentREPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelMar 18th, 2019Veronica P. from Tupelo, MS writes:
How can someone make a decision for a child when they have never been a parentREPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelJan 20th, 2019Someone from Raleigh, NC writes:
Family Court judges, social workers, psychologists, psycatrists, GAL, court clerk’s and family law attorneys are a criminal enterprise that is breaking American families.. stop funding this criminal enterprise . Stop abusing families and children. Judges and law firm run criminal enterprise via exparte communications, taking family asserts properties, bank accounts leaving well to do family as beggars. These lowly greedy lawyers become family court judges and work with family members colleagues that bring clients to family court judges that destroy lives. Parental rights are violated and children are being drugged by therapists. Stop this insanity and abolish family courts. Attorneys are not regulated and can charge you your entire earnings Bri g you to bAnkruptcy. No therapies or classes should be forced by judges that have mutual understanding with mo ey mongers and puppet therapist/ pscologists that will say/ report what judge wants so that he and his lawyer partner can put pressure on a parent and write thousands in attorney fees that can be shared by judges and law firms. IVD ageny funding needs to stop so that unethical judges and court officers stop making money and retirement at the expense if children and families.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelNov 8th, 2018joe b. from Los Angeles, CA writes:
Attachment 1 Examples of Effective IV-D State Agency Practices Among the states that offer effective ways to manage the relationship between Private Collection Agencies (PCAs) and IV-D agencies are: Arizona: When contacted by a PCA, the state issues a standard letter of confirmation of address change to the custodial parent (CP). The state requires that the CP return the authorization form before the change of address is made. This allows the state to verify the request. If the form is returned with a valid signature (compared to what the state has on file), then the state notifies the noncustodial parent (NCP) that he/she must continue to send payments to the state disbursement unit (SDU), and the state will forward the collection to the PCA. This allows the state to maintain the payment record and to retain assigned arrears. This also allows the NCP to know the CP is working with a PCA but reminds the NCP that the court order requires all payments to go through the SDU. Contact: Annmarie Mena, (602) 274-7703 or annmarie.mena@de.state.az.us Connecticut: By state law, PCAs must disburse payments to obligees within 60 days of the month in which the collection was made. No fee can be collected on support payments made through the efforts of a government agency. The agreement between the PCA and the obligee must specify that the State of Connecticut and all other states offer child support services for a minimal fee. The law has been in effect since July, 2001. Contact: Diane Fray (860) 424-5253 or diane.fray@po.state.ct.us Maryland: Maryland has very well spelled out and articulated policy statements for staff and clients about PCAs. A CP who wishes to have case or account information and child support payments sent to him/her at the address of a PCA must provide the local IV-D agency with the following: Accurate and complete case identifying information; A signed statement from the CP specifically authorizing the release of case information and the mailing of payments to the PCA on his/her behalf; and A signed statement from the CP indicating whether he/she wishes to continue to receive child support services from the IV-D agency or to terminate those services. As mandated by federal law, Maryland never closes a case on the basis of a request by a PCA and will not "suspend" enforcement for an open case if requested to do so by a CP. A state IV-D agency may not close the case unless it satisfies the case closure criteria defined in federal regulations. In addition, state policy specifies that the IV-D agency may not require a CP to close a case based solely on the fact that the CP has entered into a legal agreement with a PCA. Support payments received on behalf of the CP will be sent to the CP at the PCA's address. The CP remains the payee for any checks issued by the IV-D agency. The state regards any payments made by the NCP directly to the PCA to be in violation of the court order. The state has been following this policy since approximately 1992. Contact: Teresa Kaiser (410) 767-7043 or tkaiser@csea.dhr.state.md.us Oregon: Oregon's law, which relates to the partnership between the IV-D agency and PCAs, became effective in January 2002. CPs who enter into a contract with a PCA must send a copy of the PCA agreement and a state-issued form requesting that the PCA be added to the case. The form specifies the services the CP can receive free from the IV-D agency. The IV-D agency reviews the agreement to be certain that it complies with the criteria in the state's law. If everything is in order, the IV-D agency puts the PCA on the case and the SDU disburses all collections to the CP through the PCA from that point forward for 180 days. The obligee may then renew the request that the SDU disburse the payments to the CP through the PCA for additional 180-day periods. If the PCA performs locate and investigative services on the case, it should report any findings to the IV-D agency. The PCA is not permitted to take any enforcement action (as defined by state law) without the advance authorization of the IV-D agency. Contact: Ronelle Shankle (503) 986-6087 or ronelle.shankle@doj.state.or.us Texas: Texas has a long-standing policy of cooperation with PCAs. Texas recognizes that federal law specifies that the IV-D agency has no legal authority to deny parents the right to choose a PCA, and the state believes as a matter of policy that because the need for child support is so great, no assistance should be turned away if that assistance may get more support to children who deserve it. Texas began regulating the work of PCAs in 2002. Under the state's regulations, a PCA must register with the Texas Department of Banking to engage in business and provide a surety bond of $50,000. A PCA must maintain records of all child support payments made through the PCA to families. The records must include a copy of the child support order. If a client is dissatisfied with the service of the PCA, he/she may file a claim against the PCA with the Texas Department of Banking. The Department of Banking may revoke the registration of a registered PCA. In addition, an individual may bring a civil action, including an action for damages. Texas recognizes that there are outstanding issues not adequately addressed by its policies. These include: Interstate issues - because of language in state regulations, PCA activities in cases where the obligee is not a resident of Texas are not covered by the statute regulating PCAs; and Payment processing issues - Sometimes PCA staff request obligors and employers to send payments directly to the PCA, bypassing SDUs or official child support payment registries. When a court order requires the obligor to pay to an official registry or SDU, payment to the PCA places the obligor out of compliance with the specific terms of the order. In addition, those payments may not be included in the SDU or official registry's payment record, unless the PCA reports the payment. Bypassing the SDU may also deprive a state and the Federal government of collections that should have been retained to pay off assigned arrears. On the other hand, while some states report that mailing a payment to the PCA instead of the CP is an issue because of system restrictions (such as limits of the number of data fields available), Texas does it without a problem. Texas allows the CP to choose whether he/she wants just the payments to be sent to the PCA or wants all communications to go there as well. The CP can also change these choices at any time. Contact: Cynthia Bryant (512) 460-6122 or Cynthia.Bryant@cs.oag.state.tx.us Attachment 2 Sample Letters Used by State IV-D Agencies Regarding Custodial Parent Requests to Send Payments to the Address of a PCA We are including copies of letters from several state IV-D agencies (New Hampshire, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Wisconsin) concerning a parent's request to receive payments through a PCA. We do not endorse any one of these letters over others, nor do we mean to imply that letters not shown are unsatisfactory. We welcome copies of any letters that states find effective. Several customer service-oriented features of the sample letters include: List of advisories to a CP, such as: that, for current or former public assistance recipients, child support payment for any period of assistance will be retained by the state IV-D agency; payments may be delayed by the PCA; payments should go through the state IV-D agency first; the CP is responsible for paying any fees; the state does not charge a fee for any services; Requirement for a signed, notarized statement from the CP to authorize sending payments to the PCA on behalf of the CP and assurance that the state IV-D agency will not release any confidential information, pursuant to legal cites, to the PCA without the CP's written consent; Notice to the CP of the state IV-D agency's responsibilities in the case while the PCA is the CP's authorized representative; Notice to the NCP that the CP has hired a PCA and advising the NCP that he/she should make sure to receive full credit for payments made; Letter to the PCA that it must notify the state IV-D agency of any payments the PCA receives directly, not through the state agency; Notice to a PCA that it must safeguard information regarding the child support case and may use the information only for case-specific purposes; Notice to a CP written in English on one side and in Spanish on the other; and A revocation form requiring notarized signature of the CP to discontinue sending payments to the PCA and to send payments to the CP directly. Attachment 3 [SAMPLE] INFORMATION THAT PARENTS SHOULD CONSIDER BEFORE HIRING A CHILD SUPPORT PRIVATE COLLECTION AGENCY (PCA) Some customers choose to hire private, for-profit, collection agencies in addition to, or instead of, the State Child Support Enforcement Agency (CSEA). The choice whether to pursue support enforcement with a public or private entity rests with you. If you are receiving public assistance, foster care maintenance, or Medicaid, the CSEA will be required to pursue support enforcement on your behalf. We want to help you make an informed choice, with full knowledge of the fees and other terms and conditions levied by the private entity. This publication answers commonly asked questions about PCAs and provides you with a list of helpful hints to assist you in deciding whether a PCA is right for you. What is a Private Collection Agency? A private collection agency (PCA) is a privately-owned, for-profit business that, for a fee, helps parents collect child support. Can I hire a PCA even if I already receive services from the State Child Support Enforcement Agency? Yes. You are entitled to receive services from your State CSEA even if you also retain a PCA. How much does a PCA cost and how do I pay? Fee arrangements vary from company to company. Most PCAs are paid on a "contingency fee" basis. This means that you are not required to pay the PCA for its services in advance, but the PCA will take a percentage of the child support it receives on your behalf after a contract is signed. These contingency fee rates generally range from 25 to 33 percent. Depending on the contract, a PCA may collect fees on any amounts received by the PCA, even if the money was collected as a result of the work of the State CSEA or if the PCA received the money as current, rather than past, support. However, some agencies will not take a fee on current child support if the NCP has made payments on a regular basis for a certain period of time prior to your case being placed with the PCA. PCAs may also charge application or processing fees or charge additional fees, for example, if they need to use a lawyer for your case. You should read the contract carefully to make sure that you understand how the PCA will be paid. How long is the PCA contract in force? The duration of the contract should be defined clearly in the contract. Many PCA contracts last until a stated, total dollar amount of child support is collected. Based on the information you give to the PCA, it can provide you with an initial estimate of the total amount of support to be collected. Most PCAs will continue to receive this fee until all arrearages, plus interest as allowed by state law, have been paid in full. Can I get out of my contract if I am unhappy with the service that I receive? Your right to cancel the agreement depends upon the terms of the contract and any state laws governing such contracts. Most PCAs will permit unconditional cancellation (or "rescission") of a contract for a limited period of time after you have initially signed the contract. Likewise, a PCA may allow you to cancel the contract after the rescission period, but only if they are unsuccessful in collecting child support for a certain length of time. Be sure that you understand how you can cancel the contract and any penalties or other liabilities that you may face if you cancel the contract. Do I have to close my case with the State Child Support Enforcement Agency to hire a PCA? This decision is up to you. A PCA may require that you close your case with the State CSEA as a condition of your contract. However, as noted above, State CSEAs do not require that you close your case if you hire a PCA. Can I hire a PCA if I am or have been a recipient of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)? Yes. You may retain a PCA if you are a current or former recipient of TANF or Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). This is also true if you receive foster care maintenance or Medicaid. However, under Federal law, the State is entitled to receive child support payments as reimbursement for any public assistance received for your child. Therefore, while you are receiving assistance, you may only be entitled to receive child support collected by the State in excess of amounts received as current support in a given month. Check with your CSEA for additional details. Are PCAs regulated by the government? PCAs' practices generally are not regulated by state or federal authorities. Some states regulate the practices of PCAs, including requiring a collection license or capping the contingency fee rates that they can charge. Ask your State CSEA or Better Business Bureau for more information. HELPFUL HINTS FOR CUSTODIAL PARENTS CONSIDERING HIRING A PRIVATE COLLECTION AGENCY Read your contract carefully and make sure that you fully understand your rights and obligations under the contract before you sign. Make sure that the contract reflects your understanding in plain English. The State CSEA is not a party to any contract between you and the PCA. Do not take the name of the PCA for granted or assume that it is affiliated with a public agency. Some PCAs use names and letterheads that appear to have some official or public connotation. That a PCA refers to itself as a "child support enforcement agency" does not mean that it has any relationship to the CSEA or any other government agency. Get as much information as you can about the PCA that you are considering. For example, find out if the PCA: is required to have a collection license; is authorized to do business in your state and on what terms; charges an initial application fee and, if so, how much and if it is refundable if the PCA is unsuccessful; collects fees on all money it receives on your behalf, even if the State CSEA collected the money, the money received is for current, rather than past due, support, or if you are already receiving regular payments; charges any legal fees or costs, such as court costs, attorney fees, etc., in addition to the contingency fees otherwise taken; allows you to cancel the contract and, if so, under what conditions and with what consequences; has been sued by any current or past client. If so, ask for copies of those complaints and review them carefully. The Clerk of the Court in the county that the agency is located should be able to inform you of any law suits that have been filed against the PCA in that county and possibly in the State; has been the subject of complaints with a Better Business Bureau, State Attorney General's office or Office of Consumer Affairs, or the Federal Trade Commission; charges a fee in excess of the amount allowed by State law; provides the collection services itself or merely refers you to a general collection agency; provides you with an accounting of all amounts received and paid to you; has a "fiduciary" bond that guarantees that you will receive any money that the PCA has handled on your behalf; has operated under a different name in the past; has a local office that you can visit to meet with a staff member in person if you have any questions or concerns about your case; is incorporated and, if so, in what state(s); if the PCA is a corporation, the incorporating State's Secretary of State can inform you if the corporation is in good standing; is a subsidiary of another company, such as a consumer collection agency; if so, you may want to find out more information about that company to ensure that it is in good standing; uses independent marketing agents; if so, you should speak directly to the PCA to ensure that your questions are answered to your satisfaction; initiates legal actions against the noncustodial parent and, if so, under what circumstances; has written policies explaining when you will receive money the PCA receives on your behalf; and requires you to close your case with the State CSEA. If you close your case with the State CSEA, you should be aware that the following collection services may no longer be available to you: tracking changes in the noncustodial parent's employment and transferring wage withholding orders to the new employer if the noncustodial parent changes jobs; charging interest on past due support owed to you; intercepting federal and state tax refunds, lottery winnings, insurance settlements, workers' compensation or unemployment insurance benefits from the noncustodial parent to pay child support; levying and seizing the noncustodial parent's assets without a court order; denying the noncustodial parent a passport if he or she owes past due support; suspending professional, trade, motor vehicle, recreational and other licenses. You may not be able to close your case with the State CSEA if the noncustodial parent owes past due child support that has been assigned to the State for public assistance, foster care maintenance, or Medicaid provided for your child. Even if you close your case with State CSEA, child support payments received through the withholding of the noncustodial parent's income must continue to be collected by the State Disbursement Unit, which is operated by the State CSEA.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelSep 22nd, 2018Kevin F. from Overland Park, KS signed.
Sep 20th, 2018John M. from Tolland, CT writes:
Corruption! At the cost of our children.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelAug 29th, 2018Joll S. from Burlington, NC writes:
Title lV-D funding needs to be abolished. 50/50 equal shared parenting is what is best for kids and our kids futures. I’ve-D funding is hijacking good and fit parents out of their children’s lives!! Every dollar that is collected in child support is matched by the state . The state is maximizing and profiting off of the noncustodial parent!! This must stop. Please look up what Title lV-D funding is. Get educated about what is happening to goo and fit parents. Please get involved and support 50/50 shared parenting!REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelAug 20th, 2018Tamera D. from Nappanee, IN writes:
We owe it to our children , grandchildren , tomorrow’s future . Family court is tearing families apart one by one . You have fathers that want to be in their children’s lives that pay support but are not allowed to see their children or very little time . Please at the very least get corrupt judges and ad-litems out of the position of destroying livesREPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelJul 19th, 2018Joseph K. from Bath, PA signed.
Jun 29th, 2018Robert D. from Rochester, NY writes:
I am fighting this organized money laundering scam in Rochester NY, Monroe county. The woman who claims I am the father to her son, told me to take a hike within hours of telling me she was pregnant. I offered marriage so the child would have a home with two parents, but that was not part of this woman's plan, I was to be immediately discarded like garbage and the child was going to be used as a ransom demand to shake me down for money. It has been just recently that I have learned that I actually had real rights and unless there was a finding of fact that I was unfit, the state had no business interfering with my relationship with the child. What the took place between the hearing officer Linda Pilato, my attorney Mike Schmitt and law guardian Ella Van Loon is that they re-classified me as the non-custodial parent and the bulk of my parental rights were severed. it never occurred to me that each of these people were actually making offers to me, but they use their titles to intimidate you, you think they are pushing a law on you, when in fact they are making bogus offers. For example, Law guardian Ella Van Loon said to me in a private meeting, "Deanne is willing to let you see Nick for 2 hours on Christmas" This opened the door to leave out any holiday visits. The other recommendation she made to the referee Thomas Polito was that I be chaperoned by the mother for the first 6 visits., this is to make it look like on paper that I am unfit, though they had no evidence of any wrong doing. Ella Van Loon claims she talked to the little 5 year old boy and clams he said he wants his mom around when he is with his dad., how manipulating is that? if she even asked him that. It is infuriating to think how each of these people played me. it has been seven years now, and I have not seen the child that I am held at gun point to pay for and I have been alienated from him since his birth 16 years ago. And I learned that Title IV-D is a contract that needed my permission.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelJun 14th, 2018Greg T. from Portland, OR writes:
I am a long time veteran of government corruption. Having worked in it and experienced it! I cannot emphasize the need to overhaul Family Courts, DHS, CPS & The Child Support hustle.. These organization mentioned have Executive Authority and answer to no one... Their main goal is collect monies from people, put people in jail, destroy families, emasculate men and then turn to the federal government and ask for more money. This is what FDR warned us about in about during the Great Depression- Military Industrial Complex but Government is the Industrial Complex. These agencies are acting on perverse incentives using government institutions like CPS, DHS, Family Courts and Law Enforcement to terrorize citizens of the U.S. They remove and interrogate children without the consent of the parents. They coerce children using law enforcement and skillful wording coercing children. They use law enforcement to carry out their dirty work. They then use the State Courts to carry out adjudicating these matters where the burden is put upon the honest working class citizen who then has to pay money for justice. And if you have no money for Justice you are just assed out. These perverse bureaucratic systems of the government need to be abolished! Along with that the Government needs to stay out of our families!REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelJun 8th, 2018Abdul G. from Bladenboro, NC signed.
REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelJun 7th, 2018Someone from Carson City, NV writes:
We have to bring light to this evil! Too many children are suffering!REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelMay 26th, 2018Lisa A. from Egg Harbor Township, NJ writes:
I'M REPRESTING NJ JUNE 2, 2018... WE NEED MORE FAMILIES TO STAND UP AND HELP FIGHT FOR CHANGE. IF YOU HAVE A CPS CASE WHERE CIVIL RIGHTS WERE VIOLATED, AMERICAN AMENDMENTS BROKE, NON ABUSED / NEGLECTED KIDS TAKEN FOR NO GOOD CAUSE, PLEASE MESSAGE ME YOUR STORY.. FAST AS OUR MEETING IS JUNE 2, 2018 . IT'S UP TO US TO MAKE CHANGE AND WE ARE / WILL FOR NEW JERSEY. LET'S GET OUR KIDS AND GRANDKIDS HOME NOW !!!! FACEBOOK Lisa Marie Obermann -Artuso... PLEASEREPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelMay 24th, 2018Sandra S. from Wildwood, NJ writes:
The Family Courts state, they make the decisions they want and don’t follow the Constitution. It’s all about money . And nothing to do with what’s in the CHILDRENS best interest. They all belong in jail.Putting money befor the Kids. Then the world sits by an wonders what’s wrong with the kids today? 90% is due to Judicial Corruption.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelMar 27th, 2018Donald C. from Kansas City, MO writes:
This fraud has to stop its destroying are family’s and next will come after the queens and childrenREPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelFeb 15th, 2018Dee G. from Brooklyn, NY writes:
Seven Years of Hell. Broke and disgusted all due to the Family Court. What happened to our First and 14th amendment. I the mother of twins was never heard thrown out of family court and appeals, without one anyone hearing my side. Defendant lied without proof and they patted the defendant on the back. My life now is a living hell. They created a monster and I am now being harassed. And not even my children where heard. I was told not necessary.REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, CancelJan 27th, 2018Someone from Traverse City, MI writes:
The corruption I have seen first hand under this title 4, HAS GOT TO STOP. THEY ARE TRAFFICKING OUR CHILDREN. ARE THEY NOT?REPORT COMMENTS
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.
No, Cancel
Do you want to report these comments to the moderator for removal? They should be offensive, threatening, a duplicate submission, or spam.