Share:

Declare Individual Sovereignty

Messages Sent So Far
A Declaration of Individual Sovereignty

Be it known that I, _______________________, the undersigned, do hereby declare myself to be a sovereign individual under the provisions of the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America and that I reserve for myself all the rights and powers conferred upon the People of the United States of America by the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, which states:

?The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution,

nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively,

or to the people.?

Recognizing that both the Federal Government of the United States of America and the governments of the several States derive their just powers to govern from the consent and will of the People, and that the People may reserve the right to throw off the bonds of servitude and oppression of a tyrannical government, as per the guarantees made in the Constitution of the United States of America and the Bill of Rights, it is the incumbent duty of all the People to declare such tyrannical governments null and void according to the provisions and limitations imposed upon those governments by the Constitution of the United States of America and to either seek to establish a new and just government in adherence to the Constitution of the United States of America or, if that has become no longer possible, to declare themselves, each one, an individual sovereign entity beholden to no governance save for their own.

In accordance with these aims and purposes as stated herein, I hereby and herewith declare myself to be free of any and all governance by either the Federal Government or any of the several States of the United States of America and I hereby and herewith reserve and reclaim all the rights enumerated by the Constitution of the United States of America and the Bill of Rights, as well as all natural rights not enumerated by the Constitution or the Bill of Rights, such as they are recognized to be inherent conditions of human existence. These rights shall include, but are in no way limited to the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, as well as the right to keep and bear arms, which shall be construed to mean any and all types of weaponry that may be necessary, in defense of my life, liberty and property from all aggressors whoever they may be.

Signed ______________________________ this ______ day of ______, 20___

Public Comments
Mar 18th, 2017
Brad J. from Bountiful, UT signed.
Mar 12th, 2017
Andrew A. from Oklahoma City, OK signed.
Mar 9th, 2017
Deanna F. from Montague, CA signed.
Mar 7th, 2017
Someone from Charlotte, NC signed.
Mar 6th, 2017
Someone from Reno, NV writes:
Quotation mark icon
why is it so hard to claim something you allready have Bye Right!!?
Mar 5th, 2017
Someone from Brandon, FL signed.
Mar 5th, 2017
Someone from Austin, TX signed.
Mar 5th, 2017
Someone from Johnston, IA signed.
Mar 2nd, 2017
Clayton P. from Los Angeles, CA signed.
Mar 1st, 2017
Someone from Downey, CA signed.
Mar 1st, 2017
Shawn K. from Newport, WA writes:
Quotation mark icon
Any other legal forms and or info on how to file them to free myself from my strawman and this sickening money hungry crooked and criminal corporation of the UNITED STATES would be very appreciative. Thank any and all of whom are letting people know the truth. It's about time we take back out God given rights and no longer be identified by as a number or a piece of property and regain ownership of ourselves.
Feb 20th, 2017
Travis F. from Durango, CO signed.
Feb 20th, 2017
Someone from Durango, CO writes:
Quotation mark icon
This is good information thanks for sharing!
Feb 20th, 2017
Someone from Durango, CO writes:
Quotation mark icon
When you fill out this form as part of the proses, where do you send it? So that you are declared everwhere not just in one place.
Feb 19th, 2017
Someone from Cotati, CA signed.
Feb 16th, 2017
Jerell B. from Merrillville, IN signed.
Feb 15th, 2017
Kenneth Keith B. from Stuart, FL writes:
Quotation mark icon
this is an excellent notice of intent, a declaration of Sovereignty , an oath to your state , a notice you are using federal reserve notes against your will, if you want to know more , read Dr. Paul Pharms PHD. well done. make sure you know your birth certificate is a bank note and there is a trust cesta que trust that you can be sovereign and a first class citizen.
Feb 15th, 2017
Marion b. from Los Angeles, CA writes:
Quotation mark icon
What are the procedures to obtaining this infomation
Feb 10th, 2017
Jennifer F. from Plymouth, MI signed.
Feb 9th, 2017
david m. from Moody, AL signed.
Feb 9th, 2017
Someone from Cincinnati, OH writes:
Quotation mark icon
2925 Westridge AVE. Cincinnati. Ohio. 45238
Feb 8th, 2017
;Kenneth David R. from Morganton, NC writes:
Quotation mark icon
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AFFIDAVIT and DECLARATION of SOVEREIGNTY NOTICE and CLAIM of RIGHTS A verified plain statement of facts Whereas, ?We the People of the United States? hold our God-given unalienable sovereign rights to self-govern by powers endowed by our Creator and guaranteed by the ten Articles of the Bill of Rights, circa 1791, which reserved and preserved the sovereignty of the people. We the People in the Republic for the united States of America reaffirm and continue ?The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,? July 4, 1776, and ?The Constitution for the United States of America,? ratified with the Bill of Rights, circa 1791. Further, the Supreme Court affirmed the sovereignty of the people in 1793 in Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 US 419 by Chief Justice John Jay stating, ?At the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people, and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects and have none to govern but themselves.? President Andrew Jackson likewise referenced this sovereignty in a proclamation on December 25, 1868, ?and in the name of the sovereign People of the United States.? Therefore, as one of ?We the People of the United States," by these presents, I affirm, witness, and testify I am a Peaceful American sovereign, known as a Citizen of the United States of America and of the free State in which I live, pursuant to our de jure Constitution, c.1791, Article I, Section 2, or Article IV, Section 2, in referencing a ?Citizen of the United States? or ?Citizens of each State.? I hold the sole, exclusive, and lawful meaning of Citizen to be a natural born Citizen or lawfully naturalized living man or women living on the organic geographical land mass within the territorial and jurisdictional borders of the Republic for the united States of America. These Citizens, from the free and independent states have joined together, irrespective of the geographical states in which they live, and are known as We the People of the United States of America, the Republic for the united States of America, and/or the Republic for/of the United States of America; and I affirm, witness, and testify, I am not a United States citizen, U.S. Citizen, federal citizen, civilian, resident, debtor, chattel, slave or subject of political venue or jurisdiction by cause of contract with incorporated powers of the District of Columbia, directly or indirectly. I hold no allegiance and/or fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, sovereign, country, or affiliate subject. I am not bound to Pg. 1 of 19 -AFFIDAVIT: Kenneth David Rich© any political district, agency, affiliate, or incorporated powers of any kind, willingly or unintentionally, which would waive lawful United States of America Citizenship status, responsibilities, duties, and rights enumerated and protected by our de jure Constitution. All such terms and conditions are inferior and only enforceable, binding, and valid to the extent that all are subject to the supremacy of the aforementioned Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and lawful amendments and general laws pursuant; and I affirm, witness, and testify my sole and exclusive political jurisdiction and law venue rest on the blessings of liberty and justice for all; the common law of God; the Holy Bible; sacred trust of self-governance; the Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776; the Constitution for the United States of America, of ?the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and eighty seven,? and ratified with the Bill of Rights, circa 1791; and lawful amendments and general laws pursuant. A. Be it known to all courts, governments, and other parties, that I: Kenneth David Rich© , am a natural, free-born Peaceful Sovereign, without subjects. I am neither subject to any entity anywhere, nor is any entity subject to me. I neither dominate anyone, nor am I dominated. B. My authority for this statement is the same as it is for all free Sovereigns everywhere: the age-old, timeless, and universal respect for the intrinsic rights, property, freedoms, and responsibilities of the Sovereign People. C. I am not a "person" when such term is defined in statutes of the United States or statutes of the several states when such definition includes artificial entities. I refuse to be treated as a federal or state created entity which is only capable of exercising certain rights, privileges, or immunities as specifically granted by federal or state governments. D. I may voluntarily choose to comply with the man-made laws which serve to bring harmony to society, but no such laws, nor their enforcers, have any authority over me. I am not in any jurisdiction, for I am not of subject status. Consistent with the eternal tradition of natural common law, unless I have harmed or violated someone or their property, I have committed no crime; and am therefore not subject to any penalty. E. I act in accordance with the following U.S. Supreme Court case: "The individual may stand upon his constitutional rights as a citizen. He is entitled to carry on his private business in his own way. His power to contract is unlimited. He owes no such duty [to submit his books and papers for an examination] to the State, since he receives nothing there from, beyond the protection of his life and property. His rights are such as existed by the law of the land [Common Law] long antecedent to the organization of the State, and can only be taken from him by due process of law, and in accordance with the Constitution. Among his rights are a refusal to incriminate himself, and the immunity of himself and his property from arrest or seizure except under a warrant of the law. He owes nothing to the public so long as he does not trespass upon their rights." Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 at 47 (1905). [emphasis added] F. Thus, be it known to all, that I reserve all my natural common law right not to be compelled to perform under any contract that I did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. And Pg. 2 of 19 -AFFIDAVIT: Kenneth David Rich© furthermore, I do not accept the liability associated with the compelled and pretended "benefit" of any hidden or unrevealed contract or commercial agreement. G. As such, the hidden or unrevealed contracts that supposedly create obligations to perform, for persons of subject status, are inapplicable to me, and are null and void. If I have participated in any of the supposed "benefits" associated with these hidden contracts, I have done so under duress, for lack of any other practical alternative. I may receive such "benefits" but, I have not accepted them in a manner that binds me to anything. H. Any such participation does not constitute "acceptance" in contract law, because of the absence of full disclosure of any valid "offer," and voluntary consent without misrepresentation or coercion, under contract law. Without a valid voluntary offer and acceptance, knowingly entered into by both parties, there is no "meeting of the minds," and therefore no valid contract. Any supposed "contract" is therefore void, ab initio. I. From my age of consent to the date affixed below I have never signed a contract knowingly, willingly, intelligently, and voluntarily whereby I have waived any of my natural common law rights, and, as such, Take Notice that I revoke, cancel, and make void ab initio my signature on any and all contracts, agreements, forms, or any instrument which may be construed in any way to give any agency or department of any federal, state, county, city government authority, venue, or jurisdiction over me. J. This position is in accordance with the U.S. Supreme Court decision of Brady v. U.S., 379 U.S. 742 at 748 (1970): "Waivers of Constitutional Rights not only must be voluntary, they must be knowingly intelligent acts, done with sufficient awareness of the relevant circumstances and consequences." K. Typical examples of such compelled and pretended "benefits" are: 1. The use of Federal Reserve Notes to discharge my debts. I have used these only because in America, there is no other widely recognized currency. 2. The use of a bank account, with my signature on the bank signature card. If there is any hidden contract behind the bank signature card, my signature thereon gives no validity to it. The signature is only for verification of identity. I can't be obligated to fulfill any hidden or unrevealed contract(s) whatsoever, due to the absence of full disclosure and voluntary consent. 2.A. Likewise, my use of the bank account thereof is due to the absence of a bank not associated with the Federal Reserve System. In general, people have been prevented from issuing their own currencies, and such prevention is in violation of the United States Constitution. Were there an alternative, I would be happy to use it. To not use any bank at all is impossible or very difficult, as everyone knows, in today's marketplace. 3. The use of a Social Security number. The number normally assigned to persons of subject status, I use exceptionally, under duress, only because of the extreme inconvenience of operating without one in today's marketplace, where it is requested by banks, employers, lenders, and many other government agencies and businesses. Let it be known that I use the Social Security number assigned to me for information only. 4. The use of a driver's license. As a free Sovereign, there is no legal requirement for me to have such a license for traveling in my car. Technically, the unrevealed legal purpose of driver's Pg. 3 of 19 -AFFIDAVIT: Kenneth David Rich© license is commercial in nature. Since I don't carry passengers for hire, there is no law requiring me to have a license to travel for my own pleasure and that of my family and friends. However, because the lack of education of Law enforcement officers on this matter, should I be stopped for any reason and found to be without a license, it is likely I would be ticketed and fined or obligated to appear in court, or shot, therefore, under duress, I carry a license to avoid extreme inconvenience, or death. 5. State plates on my car. Similarly, even though technically, my car does not fit the legal definition of a "motor vehicle," which is used for commercial purposes, nevertheless, I have registered it with the state and carry the state plates on it, because to have any other plates or no plates at all, causes me to run the risk of police officer harassment and extreme inconvenience. 6. Past tax returns filed. Any tax returns I may have filed in the past were filed due to the dishonest atmosphere of fear and intimidation created by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the local assessors' offices; not because there is any law requiring me to do so. Once I discovered that the IRS and other tax agencies have been misinforming the public, I have felt it is my responsible duty to society to terminate my voluntary participation. Because such returns were filed under Threat, Duress, and Coercion (TDC), and no two-way contract was ever signed with full disclosure, there is nothing in any past filing of returns or payments that created any valid contract. Therefore, no legal obligation on my part was ever created. 7. Birth Certificate. The fact that a birth certificate was granted to me by a local hospital or government agency when I entered this world, is irrelevant to my Sovereignty. No status, high or low, can be assigned to another person through a piece of paper, without the recipient's full knowledge and consent. Therefore, such a piece of paper provides date and place information only. It indicates nothing about jurisdiction, nothing about property ownership, nothing about rights, and nothing about subject status. The only documents that can have any legal meaning, as it concerns my status in society, are those which I have signed as an adult, with full knowledge and consent, free from misrepresentation or coercion of any kind. 8. Marriage license. The acquisition of a marriage license is now being revealed as being necessary only for slaves. The act of a Sovereign such as myself obtaining such a license, through social custom and ignorance of law, has no legal effect in changing my status. This is because any such change in status, if any may be supposed to occur, could happen only through a hidden and unrevealed contract or statute. Since no hidden, unrevealed, and undisclosed information, if it exists, can be lawfully held to be binding, it is null and void. 9. Children in public school. The attendance of my children in government-supported "public" schools or government-controlled "private" schools does not create any legal tax obligation for me, nor any other legal obligation, because I never signed a contract agreeing to such obligation for the supposed "privilege" of public school attendance. 9.A. If any of my children have attended government supported "public" or controlled "private" schools, such was done under duress and not out of free will. Be it known that I regard "compulsory state education" as a violation of the Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which states in relevant part: "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction." Pg. 4 of 19 -AFFIDAVIT: Kenneth David Rich© 10. Declaration of citizenship. Any document I may have ever signed, in which I answered "yes" to the question, "Are you a U.S. citizen?" - cannot be used to compromise my status as a Sovereign, nor obligate me to perform in any manner. This is because without full written disclosure of the definition and consequences of such supposed "citizenship," provided in a document bearing my signature given freely without misrepresentation or coercion, there can be no legally binding contract. 10.A. I am not a "United States" citizen subject to its jurisdiction. The United States is an entity created by the U.S. Constitution with jurisdiction as described on the following pages of this Affidavit. I am not a "resident of," an "inhabitant of," a "franchise of," a "subject of," a "ward of," the "property of," the "chattel of," or "subject to the jurisdiction of" any corporate federal government, corporate state government, corporate county government, corporate city government, or corporate municipal body politic created under the authority of the U.S. Constitution. I am not subject to any legislation, department, or agency created by such authorities, or to the jurisdiction of any employees, officers, or agents deriving their authority there from. Further, I am not a subject of the Administrative and Legislative Article IV Courts of the several states, or Article I Courts of the United States, or bound by precedents of such courts, deriving their jurisdiction from said authorities. Take Notice that I hereby revoke, cancel, and make void ab initio any such instrument or any presumed election made by any of the several states or the United States government or any agency or department thereof, that I am or ever have voluntary elected to be treated as a United States citizen subject to its jurisdiction or a resident of any territory, possession, instrumentality or enclave under the sovereignty or exclusive jurisdiction of any of the several states or of the United States as defined in the U.S. Constitution in Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 and Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2. 11. Past voter registration. Similarly, since no obligation to perform in any manner was ever revealed in print, as part of the requirements for the supposed "privilege" to vote for government officials, any such registration on my part cannot be legal evidence of any obligation to perform. Likewise, I have granted NO jurisdiction over me, to any political office. It is my inherent right to vote on elections or issues that I feel affect all of society; NOT because I need anyone to rule over me. On the contrary - I have used the voting process only to instruct my public servants what a Citizen and Sovereign would like done. 12. Use of the 2-letter state code and zip code. My use of the 2-letter state code and zip code in my "address," which is secretly codified to indicate United States "federal zone" jurisdiction, has no affect whatsoever on my Sovereign status. Simply by receiving or sending "mail" through a quasi-federal messenger service, the postal service, at a location indicated with a 2-letter state code and zip code, cannot place me under federal jurisdiction or obligation. Such a presumption would be ludicrous. I use these codes only for the purposes of information and making it more efficacious for the U.S. Postal Service to deliver my mail. 13. Use of semantics. There are some immature people with mental imbalances, such as the craving to dominate other people, who masquerade as "government." Just because they alter definitions of words in the law books to their supposed advantage, doesn't mean I accept those definitions. The fact that they define the words "person," "address," "mail," "resident," "motor vehicle," "driving," "passenger," "employee," "income," and many others, in ways different from the common usage, so as to be associated with a subject or slave status, means nothing in real life. Pg. 5 of 19 -AFFIDAVIT: Kenneth David Rich© 13.A. Because the courts have become entangled in the game of semantics, be it known to all courts and all parties, that if I have ever signed any document or spoken any words on record, using words defined by twists in the law books different from the common usage, there can be no effect whatsoever on my Sovereign status in society thereby, nor can there be created any obligation to perform in any manner, by the mere use of such words. Where the meaning in the common dictionary differs from the meaning in the law dictionary, it is the meaning in common dictionary that prevails, because it is more trustworthy. 14. Such compelled and supposed "benefits" include, but are not limited to, the aforementioned typical examples. My use of such alleged "benefits" is under duress only, and is with full reservation of all my common law rights. I have waived none of my intrinsic rights and freedoms by my use thereof. Furthermore, my use of such compelled "benefits" may be temporary, until better alternatives become available, practical, and widely recognized. L. From my research, the ?law of the land,? is the peaceful common law, which is not influenced by acts, statutes, codes, rules, etc. Under common law, the rights, freedoms, and duties of private individuals have long been established and unlike statute law, common law has had a progression towards more freedom and personal responsibility rather than less. Among the rights and freedoms understood by common law are such things as the rights to life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, property and use thereof, privacy, peace, and the ability to travel freely in public without harassment or intimidation. The obligations and duties of those living under common law are essentially to ensure that one does not infringe or allow others to infringe upon those unalienable rights and freedoms. M. I have also learned that the rights of a free spiritual being cannot be lawfully limited without consent, as that would imply slavery. Effectively, rights are not bestowed upon one by another unless the first gives his/her consent, or the first is the lawful property of the second. The very nature of the concept of consent is that it can only exist among equals with full disclosure and without coercion. I do not recall ever being sold or purchased as a slave, nor do I recall giving my free consent to be governed or represented by any governmental agent, although at times I have been deceived and intimidated into submission. In order for lawful representation to exist, there must be mutual consent, and that consent may be revoked for any reason depending on the nature of a specific contract between the two parties. Such compelled and supposed "benefits" include, but are not limited to, the aforementioned typical examples. My use of such alleged "benefits" is under duress only, and is with full reservation of all my common law rights. I have waived none of my intrinsic rights and freedoms by my use thereof. Furthermore, my use of such compelled "benefits" may be temporary, until better alternatives become available, practical, and widely recognized. 1a. The Affiant is a private, living and sentient man. 2a. The Affiant is not a UNITED STATES ?citizen,? ?subject,? ?vessel? or ?person? or any ens legis artificial entity, procedural phantom, legal fiction or juristic personality within the UNITED STATES. 3a. Affiant is foreign to and without the UNITED STATES. 4a. Any party that would order, represent or persuade the Affiant to falsely present the Affiant as a UNITED STATE citizen, vessel or person directly or by deception, device, misnomer, mistaken identity, warrant or indictment, real or imagined, would be engaging in Enticement to Slavery. Pg. 6 of 19 -AFFIDAVIT: Kenneth David Rich© 5a. Any party that alleges a liability against the Affiant is obligated to produce an Affidavit of Liability to demonstrate such liability. 6a. The Affiant is not liable to or for any Government statutes, rules, acts and/or codes, including, without limitation, UNITED STATE Codes and statutes and/or codes of any of Respondents? political subdivisions. 7a. A legal fiction corporation cannot secure in personam jurisdiction over or against Affiant, a living man, without Affiant?s voluntary election to submit. 8a. The Affiant?s use of a notary public, Promissory Notes, and/or any other public facilities, when alternatives are generally unavailable, does not comprise Affiant?s submission to any political jurisdiction, the creation of an adhesion contract expressly or tacitly with the UNITED STATE and/or any other party real or imagined, or an appearance before anybody or tribunal, administrative or judicial, real or imagined. 9a. It would be both a violation of law and a violation of the Affiant?s God given unalienable rights if any government/corporate agent, officer or employee attempts to, or does in-fact, force, coerce, manipulate and/or deceive the Affiant into receiving any form of medical treatment at anytime whatsoever, including but not limited to vaccinations. 10a. All words herein are as Affiant defines them. FEDERAL JURISDICTION 1.B. It is further relevant to this Affidavit that any violation of my Rights, Freedom, or Property by the U.S. federal government, or any agent thereof, would be an illegal and unlawful excess, clearly outside the limited boundaries of federal jurisdiction. My understanding is that the jurisdiction of the U.S. federal government is defined by Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution, quoted as follows: "The Congress shall have the power . . . To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (NOT EXCEEDING TEN MILES SQUARE) as may, by cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the seat of the Government of the United States, [District of Columbia] and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock -Yards and other needful Buildings; And - To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers..." [emphasis added] and Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2: "The Congress shall have the Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State." 2.B. The definition of the "United States" being used here, then, is limited to its territories: 1) The District of Columbia 2) Commonwealth of Puerto Rico 3) U.S. Virgin Islands 4) Guam 5) American Samoa 6) Northern Mariana Islands 7) Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands 8) Military bases within the several states 9) Federal agencies within the several states Pg. 7 of 19 -AFFIDAVIT: Kenneth David Rich© 3.B. It does not include the several states themselves, as is confirmed by the following cities: "We have in our political system a Government of the United States and a government of each of the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of its own who owe it allegiance, and whose rights, within its jurisdiction, it must protect. The same person may be at the same time a citizen of the United States and a Citizen of a State, but his rights of citizenship under one of these governments will be different from those he has under the other." Slaughter House Cases United States vs. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875). "THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT IS A FOREIGN CORPORATION WITH RESPECT TO A STATE." [emphasis added] Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec. §1785: NY re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S.Ct.1973, 41 L.Ed.287. 4.B This is further confirmed by the following quote from the Internal Revenue Service: Federal jurisdiction "includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and American Samoa." - Internal Revenue Code Section 312(e). 5.B. In legal terminology, the word "includes" means "is limited to." When referring to this "District" United States, the Internal Revenue Code uses the term "WITHIN" the United States. When referring to the several States, the Internal Revenue Code uses the term "WITHOUT" the United States. Dozens, perhaps hundreds, of court cases prove that federal jurisdiction is limited to the few federal territory areas above indicated. For example, in two Supreme Court cases, it was decided: 6.B. "The laws of Congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government," Caha v. United States, 152 U.S., at 215. "We think a proper examination of this subject will show that the United States never held any municipal sovereignty, jurisdiction, or right of soil in and to the territory, of which Alabama or any of the new States were formed..." "[B]ecause, the United States have no constitutional capacity to exercise municipal jurisdiction, sovereignty, or eminent domain, within the limits of a State or elsewhere, except in the cases in which it is expressly granted..." "Alabama is therefore entitled to the sovereignty and jurisdiction over all the territory within her limits, subject to the common law," Pollard v. Hagan, 44 U.S. 221, 223, 228, 229. Likewise, Title 18 of the United States Code at §7 specifies that the "territorial jurisdiction" of the United States extends only outside the boundaries of lands belonging to any of the several States. 7.B. Therefore, in addition to the fact that no unrevealed federal contract can obligate me to perform in any manner without my fully informed and uncoerced consent, likewise, no federal statutes, codes, acts, rules, or regulations apply to me or have any jurisdiction over me. I hereby affirm that I do not reside or work in any federal territory of the "District" United States, and that therefore no U.S. federal government statutes or regulations have any authority over me. Pg. 8 of 19 -AFFIDAVIT: Kenneth David Rich© 8.B. Any and all contracts or agreements which would tend to indicate that your Affiant is a ?U.S. citizen?; a citizen of the federal government, are hereby declared to be null and void. Your Affiant hereby declares that any such contract/agreement was not entered into knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally, and therefore was the result of Constructive Fraud (Black?s Law Dictionary 6th Ed. p. 314). 9.B. Your Affiant hereby declares that any and all contracts or agreements which may be claimed to exist between your Affiant and the de facto STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA to be null and void, as any such contract/agreement was not entered into knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally and constitutes constructive fraud. POWERS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS OF UNITED STATES AND STATE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS 1.C. All United States and State government officials are hereby put on notice that I expect them to have recorded valid Oaths of Office in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, Article VI: "The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation to support this Constitution..." 2.C. I understand that by their Oaths of Office all U.S. and State government officials are contractually bound by the U.S. Constitution as formulated by its framers, and not as "interpreted," subverted, or corrupted by the U.S. Supreme Court or other courts. 3.C. According to the Ninth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. ?and the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." 4.C. Thus, my understanding from these Amendments is that the powers of all U.S. and State government officials are limited to those specifically granted by the U.S. Constitution. 5.C. I further understand that any laws, statutes, ordinances, regulations, rules, and procedures contrary to the U.S. Constitution, as written by its framers, are null and void, as expressed in the Sixteenth American Jurisprudence Second Edition, Section 177: "The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows: "The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in Pg. 9 of 19 -AFFIDAVIT: Kenneth David Rich© legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted." "Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it..." 6.C. "A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby." "No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it."" [emphasis added] and as expressed once again in the U.S. Constitution, Article VI: "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." 7.C. All U.S. and State government officials are hereby put on notice that any violations of their contractual obligations to act in accordance with their U.S. Constitution, may result in prosecution to the full extent of the law, as well as the application of all available legal remedies to recover damages suffered by any parties damaged by any actions of U.S. and State government officials in violation of the U.S. Constitution. 8.C. I am hereby notifying all interested parties that I have revoked my consent to be governed by fictitious corporate entities domestic or foreign with which I do not have a subsisting contract. I declare that I am not a child, a slave, nor the ward of, but a free man capable of administering my own affairs. Whereas it is my understanding united States of America is a common law jurisdiction, and, Whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and, Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law, and, Whereas it is my understanding a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and, Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government recognized as lawful in united States of America is a representative one, and, Whereas it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent, and, Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist, and, Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one?s Social Security Number, and, Whereas it is my understanding people in the united States of America have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and, Pg. 10 of 19 -AFFIDAVIT: Kenneth David Rich© Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and, Whereas a Peaceful Sovereign Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and, Whereas I, :Kenneth David Rich©, am a Freeman-on-the-Land, and, Whereas it is my understanding that acting peacefully within community standards does not breach the peace, and, Whereas it is my understanding that I have the right to purchase arms and ammunition, to keep and bear arms, firearms at all times and places, for defense, self-protection, protection of family, friends, property, and parties needing physical protection of person or property, for hunting, target shooting of any kind;, and, Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and, Whereas I am a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and not a child, I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and, Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and, Whereas it is my understanding corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and, Whereas it is my understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate ones actions, and, Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and, Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation to attend and the ones issued by United States or any of its agencies creates no obligation or dishonor if ignored, and, Whereas it is my understanding Law Enforcement officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Sovereign Freeman-on-the Land are in fact breaking the law, and, Whereas I have the power to refuse intercourse or interaction with Law Enforcement officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and, Whereas permanent estoppels by acquiescence barring any Law Enforcement officer, Agent, Agencies or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Sovereign Freeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time, 9.C. Therefore be it now known to any and all governments and affected parties, that I, :Kenneth David Rich©, a Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations restrictions and maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter. Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my communities? standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom. Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me is held under a claim of right. Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or color of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de-jure. Pg. 11 of 19 -AFFIDAVIT: Kenneth David Rich© Furthermore, I claim that the courts in the united States of America are de-facto and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services. Furthermore I claim the right to lawfully: 9.c.1. Exercise my ?common law right to travel?, unhindered, unencumbered at my discretion in my private conveyance of the day, to wit, my private, unregistered, unlicensed automobile. 9.c.2. Exercise my human right to travel. 9.c.3. Exercise my ?common law right? to refuse to obtain by submission; any application for any government issued license, permit or seek permission to perform any fundamentally lawful action or, enter into any government contract under duress, threat and/or intimidation which would involve committing an act of fraud and/or theft, or any other crime, by way of deception by ?I? and/or any involved government principal, employee or agent, (in compliance with my Common Law Rights,etc.). 9.c.4. Exercise my right to possess firearms and ammunition and to use the same for target practice at a range or hunting for food and further swear under oath never to open fire on another human being unless as a last resort to protect human life. Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a Peaceful Sovereign Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act. Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by Law Enforcement officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or any portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS PER HOUR or any portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and Notarized consent. Furthermore, I claim the right to use a Notary Public to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way. Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de-jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any Law Enforcement officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants who having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms. Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both. Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit. Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within Fourteen (14) days of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered in the Notary Office herein provided no later than fourteen (14) days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service. Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppels by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the Land :Kenneth David Rich©. Pg. 12 of 19 -AFFIDAVIT: Kenneth David Rich© 10.C. Let it be known to all that I, :Kenneth David Rich© Last explicitly reserves all of my rights. See UCC 1-308 which was formally UCC 1-207. ?§ 1-308. Performance or Acceptance Under Reservation of Rights. (a) A party that with explicit reservation of rights performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the rights reserved. Such words as "without prejudice," "under protest," or the like are sufficient.? I retain all of my rights and liberties at all times and in all places, nunc pro tunc (now for then) from the time of my birth and forevermore. Further, I retain my rights not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that I did not enter knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally. And furthermore, I do not accept the liability of the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract or commercial agreement. I am not ever subject to silent contracts and have never knowingly or willingly contracted away my sovereignty. Further, I am not a United States citizen or a 14th amendment citizen! I am an American National/State Citizen of the republic and reject any attempted expatriation. See 15 United States statutes at large, July 27th, 1868 also known as the expatriation statute. Wherefore all have undeniable knowledge. REVOCATION OF POWER OF ATTORNEY 1.D. Furthermore, I hereby revoke, rescind, and make void ab initio, all powers of attorney, in fact or otherwise, implied in law or otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, as it pertains to the Social Security number assigned to me, :Kenneth David Rich© as it pertains to my birth certificate, marriage or business license, or any other licenses or certificates issued by any and all government or quasi-governmental entities, due to the use of various elements of fraud by said agencies to attempt to deprive me of my Sovereignty and/or property. 2.D. I hereby waive, cancel, repudiate, and refuse to knowingly accept any alleged "benefit" or gratuity associated with any of the aforementioned licenses, numbers, or certificates. I do hereby revoke and rescind all powers of attorney, in fact or otherwise, signed by me or otherwise, implied in law or otherwise, with or without my consent or knowledge, as it pertains to any and all property, real or personal, corporeal or incorporeal, obtained in the past, present, or future. I am the sole and absolute legal owner and possess allodial title to any and all such property. 3.D. Take Notice: that I also revoke, cancel, and make void ab initio all powers of attorney, in fact, in presumption, or otherwise, signed either by me or anyone else, claiming to act on my behalf, with or without my consent, as such power of attorney pertains to me or any property owned by me, by, but not limited to, any and all quasi/color-able, public, governmental entities or corporations on the grounds of constructive fraud, concealment, and nondisclosure of pertinent facts. I am requesting a response to this AFFIDAVIT and DECLARATION of SOVEREIGNTY NOTICE and CLAIM of RIGHTS on each and every point brought up, in rebuttal to these conclusions, and where it is in error, to provide documentation of Law and Facts, without fraud or misrepresentation. Not statues, codes, acts, rules, regulations, etc, so I may understand and obey the true law. If no rebuttal is forthcoming within 10 days, this will be accepted as Evidence in Fact for my position and will permanently relieve me from any and all harassment and/or compulsion to contract with all government(s), corporation(s) in any matter against my will and consent. Respondent?s failure to provide the Affiant with a verified rebuttal to this affidavit point-by-point no later than Ten (10) days from the date of issuance, will comprise Respondent?s agreement with and confession of all facts herein, in perpetuity, the said confession being res judicata and stare decisis. Pg. 13 of 19-AFFIDAVIT: Kenneth David Rich© I affirm that all of the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I affirm that I am competent to make this Affidavit. I hereby affix my autograph to all the affirmations in this entire document with explicit reservation to all of my unalienable God giving, natural rights and my specific rights not to be bound by any "contract(s)" or "obligation(s)" which I have not entered into knowingly, voluntarily, intentionally, and without misrepresentation, duress, or coercion. The use of notary below is for identification only, and such use does not grant any "jurisdiction" to anyone, anywhere at any time. Common Law Copyright Notice 6163813860/KDR Copyright Notice: All rights reserved re common-law copyright of trade-name/trademark, KENNETH DAVID RICH©, as well as any ad all derivatives and variations in the spelling of said trade name/trade-mark - Common Law Copyright © 1959 by Kenneth David Rich©. Said common-law trade-name/trade-mark, KENNETH DAVID RICH©, may neither be used, nor reproduced, neither in whole nor in part, nor in any manner whatsoever, without the prior, express, written consent and acknowledgment of Kenneth David Rich© as signified by the blue ink signature of Kenneth David Rich© hereinafter "Secured Party". With the intent of being contractually bound, any juristic person, as well as the agent of said juristic person, consents and agrees by this Copyright Notice that neither said juristic person, nor the agent of said juristic person, shall display, nor otherwise use in any manner, the common-law trade-name/trade-mark KENNETH DAVID RICH©, nor the common-law copyright described herein, nor any derivative of, nor any variation in the spelling of, KENNETH DAVID RICH© without the prior, express, written consent and acknowledgment of Secured Party, as signified by Secured Party's signature in blue ink. Secured Party neither grants, nor implies, nor otherwise gives consent for any unauthorized use of KENNETH DAVID RICH©, and all such unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. Secured Party is not now, nor has ever been, an accommodation party, nor a surety, for the purported debtor, i.e. "KENNETH DAVID RICH©", nor for any derivative of, nor for any variation in the spelling of, said name, nor for any other juristic person, and is so-indemnified and held harmless by Debtor, i.e. "KENNETH DAVID RICH ©", in Hold-harmless Indemnity Agreement #6061638138/KDR dated the Fourth Day of the Tenth Month in the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Seven, against any and all claims, legal actions, orders, warrants, judgments, demands, liabilities, losses, depositions, summonses, lawsuits, costs, fines, liens, levies, penalties, damages, interests and expenses whatsoever, both absolute and contingent, as are due and as might become due, now existing and as might hereafter arise, and as might be suffered by, imposed upon, and incurred by Debtor for any and every reason, purpose and/or cause whatsoever. Take note also that Common Law Copyright is claimed by Secured Party over all means of personal identification of Debtor, including but not restricted or limited to all: fingerprints, footprints, palm prints, thumb prints, hand-prints, toe-prints, RNA materials, DNA materials, blood and blood fractions, biopsies, surgically removed tissue, body organs and other body parts, hair, teeth, nails, semen, urine, feces, excrement, other body fluids and matter of any kind, breath samples, voice-prints, retinal images and descriptions thereof, all other corporeal identification factors and said factors physical counterparts, all records and record numbers including the results (recorded or otherwise) of all and any tests performed on any material relating to Debtor and information pertaining thereto, and any visual image taken by any means whatsoever, notwithstanding any and all claims to the contrary. Self-executing Contract/Security Agreement in Event of Unauthorized Use: By this Copyright Notice, both the juristic person and the agent of said juristic person, hereinafter jointly and severally "User", consent and agree that any use of KENNETH DAVID RICH© other than authorized use as set forth Pg. 14 of 19 -AFFIDAVIT: Kenneth David Rich© above constitutes unauthorized use, counterfeiting, of Secured Party's common-law copyrighted property, contractually binds User and renders this Copyright Notice a Security Agreement wherein User is Debtor and Kenneth David Rich© is Secured Party, and signifies that User: 1. grants Secured Party a security interest in all User's assets, land, and personal property, and all of User's interest in assets, land, and personal property, in the sum certain amount of $750,000.00 (Seven Hundred Fifty Thousand) dollars specie of Gold coin or lawful coinage of the united States as defined by Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution of We the People for the united States of America per each occurrence of use of the common-law-copyrighted trade-name/trademark KENNETH DAVID RICH©, as well as for each and every occurrence of use of any and all derivatives of and variations in the spelling of KENNETH DAVID RICH©, plus costs, plus triple damages; authenticates this Security Agreement wherein User is Debtor and Kenneth David Rich© is Secured Party, wherein User pledges all of User's assets including but not limited or restricted to: land, consumer goods, farm products, inventory, equipment, money, investment property, commercial tort claims, letters of credit, letter-of-credit rights, chattel paper, instruments, deposit accounts, accounts, documents, general intangibles, and all User's interest in all such property now owned and hereafter acquired, now existing and hereafter arising, and wherever located, as collateral for securing User's contractual obligation in favor of Secured Party for User's unauthorized use of Secured Party's common-law-copyrighted property; 3. consents and agrees with Secured Party's filing of any forms or other documents Secured Party may see fit to lodge in respect of "1." or "2." above, with such court, filing office, or such other records office or agency as may be chosen by Secured Party; 4. consents and agrees that any and all such filings described in paragraph "3." above are not bogus, and that User will not claim that any such filing is bogus; 5. waives all defenses; and 6. appoints Secured Party as Authorized Representative for User, effective upon User's default re User's contractual obligations in favor of Secured Party as set forth below under "Payment Terms" and "Default Terms", granting Secured Party full authorization and power for engaging in any and all actions on behalf of User as Secured Party, in Secured Party's sole discretion, deems appropriate, and User further consents and agrees that this appointment of Secured Party as Authorized Representative for User, effective upon User's default, is irrevocable and coupled with a security interest. User further consents and agrees with all of the following additional terms of Self-executing Contract/Security Agreement in Event of Unauthorized Use: Payment Terms: In accordance with fees for unauthorized use of KENNETH DAVID RICH© as set forth in "1." above, User hereby consents and agrees that User shall pay Secured Party all unauthorized-use fees in full within Ten (10) days of date Secured Party's invoice (hereinafter "Invoice") itemizing said fees is sent to User. Default Terms: In event of non-payment in full of all unauthorized-use fees by User within Ten (10) days of date Invoice is sent, User shall be deemed in default and: 1. all of User's property and property pledged as collateral by User, as set forth above in paragraph "2.", immediately becomes, i.e. is, property of Secured Party; 2. Secured Party is appointed User's Authorized Representative as set forth above in "6."; and 3. User consents and agrees that Secured Party may take possession of, as well as otherwise dispose of in any manner that Secured Party, in Secured Party's sole discretion, deems appropriate, including, but not limited by, sale at auction, at any time following User's default, and without further notice, any and all of User's property and interest, described above in paragraph "2.", formerly pledged as collateral by User, now property of Secured Party, in respect of this "Self-executing Contract/Security Agreement in Event of Unauthorized Use", that Secured Party, again in Secured Party's sole discretion, deems appropriate. Pg. 15 of 19 -AFFIDAVIT: Kenneth David Rich© Terms for Curing Default: Upon event of default, as set forth above under "Default Terms", irrespective of any and all of User's former property and interest in property, described above in paragraph "2.", in the possession of, as well as disposed of by, Secured Party, as authorized above under "Default Terms", User may cure User's default only re the remainder of User's said former property and interest property, formerly pledged as collateral that is neither in the possession of, nor otherwise disposed of by, Secured Party within twenty-one (21) days of date of User's default only by payment in full. Terms of Strict Foreclosure: User's non-payment in full of all unauthorized-use fees itemized in invoice within said twenty-one (21) day period for curing defaults as set forth under "Terms for Curing Default" authorities Secured Party's immediate nonjudicial strict foreclosure on any and all remaining former property and interest in property, formerly pledged as collateral by User, now property of Secured Party, which is not in the possession of, nor otherwise disposed of by,Secured Party, upon expiration of said twenty-one (21) day default-curing period. FURTHER AFFIANT SAITH NOT Subscribed and sworn by: Kenneth David Rich© and with all my rights reserved, All Rights Reserved : Kenneth David Rich© Principal, by Special Appearance, in Propria Persona, proceeding Sui Juris. Autograph: Kenneth David Rich©, Date: 02-08-2017 AFFIDAVIT Affiant, :Kenneth David Rich©, sui juris, a natural born Citizen of North Carolina State in its de jure capacity as a republic and as one of the several states of the union created by the Constitution of the united states of America 1776/1789. This incidentally makes me an American national and a common man of the Sovereign People, does swear and affirm that Affiant has ascribed and read the foregoing facts, and in accordance with the best of Affiant's firsthand knowledge and conviction, such are true, correct, complete, and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Autograph: Kenneth David Rich©, sui juris, This Affidavit is dated: 2-8-2017 "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; ...shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary not withstanding." Article six of the U.S. Constitution. "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." - Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491. "The bill of rights is self-executing: the rights therein recognized or established by the constitution do not depend upon legislative action in order to become operative." Medina v. People, 154 Colo. 4, 387 P.2d 733 (1963) Source of natural rights. "All men have rights which have their origin as natural rights independent of any express provision of law; constitutional provisions are not the sources of these rights." Colorado Anti-Discrimination Comm?n v. Case, 151 Colo. 235, 380 P.2d 34 (1962) Pg. 16 of 19 -AFFIDAVIT: Kenneth David Rich© "There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional rights."Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945 "THE CLAIM AND EXERCISE OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT CANNOT BE CONVERTED INTO A CRIME." - Miller v U.S., 230 F 2d 486. 489. ?When an act of the legislature is repugnant or contrary to the constitution, it is, ipso facto, void.? 2 Pet. R. 522; 12 Wheat. 270; 3 Dall. 286; 4 Dall. 18. "The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void and ineffective for any purpose, since its unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment... In legal contemplation, it is as inoperative as if it had never been passed... Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no right, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection and justifies no acts performed under it... A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supercede any existing law. Indeed insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, (the Constitution JTM) it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY, 118 U.S. 425 (1886) "...all laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury v Madison, 5 US 1803 (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 170. 18 U.S.C. § 241. Conspiracy against rights If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured?They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or anattempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. 18 U.S.C. § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. Pg. 17 of 19 -AFFIDAVIT: Kenneth David Rich© NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONSTITUTION 1971 PREAMBLE We, the people of the State of North Carolina, grateful to Almighty God, the Sovereign Ruler of Nations, for the preservation of the American Union and the existence of our civil, political and religious liberties, and acknowledging our dependence upon Him for the continuance of those blessings to us and our posterity, do, for the more certain security thereof and for the better government of this State, ordain and establish this Constitution. ARTICLE I DECLARATION OF RIGHTS That the great, general, and essential principles of liberty and free government may be recognized and established, and that the relations of this State to the Union and government of the United States and those of the people of this State to the rest of the American people may be defined and affirmed, we do declare that: Section 1.  The equality and rights of persons. We hold it to be self-evident that all persons are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, the enjoyment of the fruits of their own labor, and the pursuit of happiness. Sec. 2.  Sovereignty of the people. All political power is vested in and derived from the people; all government of right originates from the people, is founded upon their will only, and is instituted solely for the good of the whole. Sec. 36.  Other rights of the people. The enumeration of rights in this Article shall not be construed to impair or deny others retained by the people. Case Law: "Silence can only be equated with fraud when there is a legal or moral duty to speak, or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading... We cannot condone this shocking conduct... If that is the case we hope our message is clear. This sort of deception will not be tolerated and if this is routine it should be corrected immediately"U.S. v. Tweel 550 F2d 297, 299-300. "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them."?Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. "The claim and exercise of a constitutional right cannot be converted into a crime."?Miller v. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489 "There can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional rights."?Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945 Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppels by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act against My Self Freeman-on-the-Land. Pg. 18 of 19 -AFFIDAVIT: Kenneth David Rich©
Feb 7th, 2017
Devin W. from Chardon, OH signed.
Feb 6th, 2017
Matthew B. from Presque Isle, ME signed.
Feb 6th, 2017
Troy M. from Auburndale, FL signed.
Feb 6th, 2017
Troy M. from Auburndale, FL signed.
Feb 6th, 2017
Troy M. from Auburndale, FL signed.
Feb 6th, 2017
Someone from Salisbury, MD signed.
Feb 4th, 2017
Michael M. from Talking Rock, GA signed.
Feb 4th, 2017
Michael M. from Talking Rock, GA signed.
Feb 4th, 2017
Michael M. from Talking Rock, GA signed.
Feb 3rd, 2017
Michael M. from Talking Rock, GA signed.
Feb 3rd, 2017
Michael M. from Talking Rock, GA signed.
Feb 3rd, 2017
Preston J. from Kingsport, TN writes:
Quotation mark icon
I declare my self a sovereign citizen as of 2/3/2017
Feb 3rd, 2017
Cody F. from Marysville, MI signed.
Feb 2nd, 2017
from Murfreesboro, TN writes:
Quotation mark icon
WTF-get a life
Feb 2nd, 2017
Someone from Lithonia, GA writes:
Quotation mark icon
I'm declaring myself a sovereign citizen as 2/2/2017.
Jan 30th, 2017
Someone from Halifax, VA signed.
Jan 29th, 2017
Someone from Lake Katrine, NY signed.
Jan 29th, 2017
Sherrold from North Chicago, IL writes:
Quotation mark icon
House Joint Resolution 192 73congress

(c) Petition2Congress, all rights reserved. For web site support: email info@rallycongress.com or call (202) 600-8357