Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Policy Changes for Employment

198 Letters and Emails Sent So Far

Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Policy Changes for Employment

Supplemental Security Income Program (SSI)

The Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program makes cash assistance payments to aged, blind, and disabled persons (including children) who have limited income and resources. The Federal Government funds SSI from general tax revenues. Many states pay a supplemental benefit to persons in addition to their Federal benefits. Some of these states have made arrangements with us to combine their supplemental payment with our Federal SSI payment into one monthly check to you. Other states manage their own programs and make their payments separately. Title XVI of the Social Security Act authorizes SSI benefits (SSA Red Book, 2010, p. 12).
Under the current Supplemental Security Income (SSI) policies, persons receiving benefits are not stimulated to seek gainful part or full-time employment. The current policies are not designed to meet the today’s economic events. Under the current policy, Supplemental Security Income (SSI) does not count the first $85 of the earnings you receive in a month, plus one-half of the remaining earnings (SSA Red Book, 2010, p. 35). This means that Supplemental Security Administration (SSA) count less than one-half of your earnings when they figure your SSI payment amount. Persons on Supplemental Security Income (SSI) are fearful to seek gainful employment because of the unstable market in job earnings. Supplemental Security Income (SSI) is currently a stable source of income for persons receiving this benefit. The current entitlement program is not designed to motivate persons on Supplemental Security Income (SSI) to prepare for employment goals. Supplemental Security Income (SSI) should be a source of income to encourage employment opportunities by being supplement resource to unemployment outcomes. Instead of being a discouragement to employment opportunities, the program should promote employment goals for those seeking other financial resources to enhance daily living activities. The goals for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) should be to encourage recipients to get off of the entitlement program, and seek employment opportunities and goals. These employment opportunities among persons on Supplemental Security Income (SSI) could assist in the stimulation of the current economy by increasing the purchasing empowerment for those gaining jobs. These are reasons for developing new policy changes to Supplemental Security Income (SSI).

Enter Your Name and Submit to Sign

don't show my name

Add your public comments (optional):
View activity report
People signing this petition:     Browse all signers
In addition to the fact that SSI policy currently discourages recipients from actively seeking work, it also sets an unrealistically low personal savings limit of only $2,000 per recipient. This limit has not been adjusted since 1989, and even that early adjustment only partially compensated for the effects of inflation over the program's first decade and a half. This problem is not unrecognized, even by the Federal Government; in 2003, the Senate Finance Committee noted that raising the SSI asset limit to make up for some of this lost ground, and indexing the limit in the future, would "allow SSI beneficiaries to save more of their resources to cover costs of an urgent nature or of a significant size- such as health emergencies, storm damages, home repairs, or winter utility bills- that because of their size or immediacy could not be covered by the monthly benefit payment that the recipient uses to pay for ongoing basic needs such as food, clothing, and shelter." It is now widely recognized among policymakers and analysts that savings and assets play an important role in economic security; it is time for this critically important program to reflect that fact. Thank you for your time and consideration.
My brother has cerebal palsy and has been discrimainated against, on top of being Hispanic. Very sad.
This is wonderful, and only makes sense! It's about empowering people, rather than shutting them down. The only handicap I see here is our legal system.