Congressional Hearings on Corruption in Courts; U.S. Constitution Denied to Pro'se Litigants / Average Citizens

Wed., Aug. 11, 2010 6:32 PM    link Christopher B. | Cleveland, OH

Copy of actual Justice denied
To: Judge Brendan J. Sheehad July 20th 2010
Regarding: case: CV-07-643245 Violation of U.S.C Title 18. § 242: And Canon Rules.
From: Estate of Jacqueline Barksdale Williams
Dear. Judge Sheehad, this communication is “to expedite business, of the court, which may make provision by rule or order for the submission and determination of motions without oral hearing upon brief written statements of reasons in support and opposition”. Civ. R. 7 (B)(2) Christopher Barksdale, as the Fiduciary in case 2006 EST0112945 filed a Motion to Vacate, a void Judgment, because this court exceeded its subject matter jurisdiction, against him and it, or Jacqueline Williams; Judge Sheehad you are presumed to know the law [RC 2311.04 & R.C. 2109. 01, 02 & 03] You Denied 07/20/10 my Motion to Vacate filed 07/19/10 in error (sic) denied my free exercise of the law, as a fiduciary, thereby committing a violation of U.S.C Title 18. § 242, therefore your 07/20/10 Precept is void, denying a pleading of a fiduciary founded on a scheme [U.S.C. 18 §1341], such Fiduciary is not “LICENSED TO PRACTICE LAW IN THE STATE OF OHIO AND MAY NOT LAWFULLY FILE PLEADINGS IN A REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY” is a scheme; I am the representative of the Estate by Letters of Authority held by the Probate Court [see motion to remove Fiduciary EXHIBIT A attached hereto] as Sole beneficiary, prior to 07/19/10 and after 11/30/2007, Deutsche Bank’s burden, your denial is subterfuge retaliation to fiduciary’s Federal action against Judges in this Court, in furtherance: “A void judgment is attended by none of the consequences of a valid adjudication. It has no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at any place. ... It is not entitled to enforcement ... All proceedings founded on the void judgment are themselves regarded as invalid. 30A Am Jur Judgments '' 44, 45” Notwithstanding, RC 2311.04 & R.C. 2109. 01, 02 & 03 there is no legal or binding force or efficacy for any purpose or at any place, of the 1/18/2008 judgment you seek to protect, [w]ithout response from Deutsche Bank moreover, pro se discrimination is a direct VIOLATION OF CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT Canon 1 & 3(B),(2) As stated in Reynolds vs. Cochran, 365 US 525, 51 Ed @d 754, 81 S Ct 723 in Am Jur P. 979, “A state or federal court which arbitrarily refuses to hear a party civil or criminal, and denies the party due process in a constitutional sense. U.S. CONST XIV AMENDMENT §1.
Additionally, Jacqueline Barksdale Williams was removed from the underlying Foreclosure action: CV-04-547780 on 09/15/2009 (attached hereto EXHIBIT B) it has perspective application in this court, Jacqueline Barksdale William’s retroactive removal defeats, Defendant Deutsche Bank’s sole Demurrer res judicata argument supporting its Motion for Summary Judgment, the effect of Vacating a Judgment places the parties in the same position, thus Deuts

Flag Comment

Wed., Jul. 21, 2010 6:52 PM    link Jacquelyn N. | Pittsburgh, PA

Wed., Jun. 16, 2010 3:59 PM    link Lisa M. | Pine Bluff, AR

Tue., Apr. 20, 2010 1:47 PM    link Larry R B. | Naples, FL

Thu., Mar. 4, 2010 1:08 PM    link michael turner w. | Cincinnati, OH

This involves Title of Nobility that is prohibited but the Bureau of mMtor Vehicle is punishing me for wanting to refuse the driver's license and plates. My car is impounded illegally and I cam not get any help at this time.This is happening in Cincinnati, Ohio

Flag Comment

Thu., Feb. 11, 2010 2:56 PM    link Della T. | Owensboro, KY

Thu., Dec. 3, 2009 9:23 PM    link MICHAEL M. | Overland Park, KS

"EQUAL JUSTICE UNDER THE LAW" are words that hold no meaning for many pro se litigants, because United States courts both the federal and state courts deny pro se litigants their due process of law intentional!-MICHAEL E. MCKINZY, SR.-12-3-2009

Flag Comment

Sat., Oct. 31, 2009 10:26 AM    link Beverly B. | Clinton, MD

I had a hearing before the bankruptcy court in Greenbelt Maryland vs Maryland Comptroller Office approximately 1998 or 1999 challenging the trumped up taxes, penalties and interest based on fiat income made up by a Maryland Comptroller agent because the Maryland Comptroller noted I didn't file an income tax report for 3 years and couldn't locate income for 1 year (because I didn't work) and only located income of $4000 for another of the 3 years (I wasn't require to file on that amount - I had a refund due. I was just still too ill to file for it or my disability income that year.) The 3rd year I had gotten somewhat better - earned $11,000. I was still too sick to work but was out of any savings, sick leave, had finally filed for my disability income for the previous year which was about $6000 for the year. Forced to go back to work as a temp employee a day here, two days there and earned the $11,000 on which I did not file a report. I was just too darn sick - I was just trying to live. During this time I couldn't/didn't pay the IRS the $45/month for 3 months. I'd finally closed out my tiny retirement Annuity account and paid 20% taxes on that which is taken before the balance is sent to you; deposited that $10,000 in Chevy Chase Bank. Their hotdog employee notified IRS of the $10,000 deposit for which they get a reward it the person is found to owe the IRS money. I owed $1,645. Fortunately I was able to pay off some debts i.e. credit cards and a couple of small debts, purchased some food for my son and myself - as I didn't know how long it would be before - or -if ever - I would get better; paid that month's mortgage payment and had next month's payment and a partial payment remaining in the bank account toward the following month's mortgage payment. IRS took that money, I eventually lost my house to foreclosure after paying on it for 12 years because GM Mortgage, who had the mortgage by then, would not let me divide that next months payment into 4 parts and allow me to pay 1 1/4 months payments for 4 months to make it up, neither would they agree to just take that months payment due and tack it onto the end of the mortgage, so, I'd just pay my house off one month later. Of course, as these Banketeers have as a rule, they will not accept partial payments, so, if you miss one payment, they will not accept the next payment unless you also include the previous payment in full. SO, they know they will force many into foreclosure, take their home, resell it and make money because they have the 12 yrs of payment I made on the house, then they have the down payment the next buyer puts on the house and they payments the next buyer continues to make. That all totals to more money in profit than the fees they pay to foreclose, and resell the house again.
So, back to the bankruptcy court hearing, so I should have filed for the year I made the $11,000 even though, again I would have been due a refund.
I represented my self towards the end

Flag Comment

Mon., Oct. 19, 2009 4:30 PM    link Lawrence I. | Louisville, KY

I would like to question the arbitrary treatment toward Mr. Freeman Davis and his illegally incarcerated mother Ms. Florean Wilson, whom both have been subjected to a Judicial System not recognizing any of eithers constitutional rights.

Flag Comment

Sun., Sep. 13, 2009 8:47 AM    link Daniel C. | Louisville, KY

Please conduct congressional hearing on corruption in courts. You can begin with the cases posted on www.pro-se-litigants.org.

Thank you!

Flag Comment