Please support HR 1203
Sign the Petition : 33 Letters and Emails Sent So Far
| H.R. 1203, would allow federal and postal retirees to use pre-tax dollars to pay their Federal Employee Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) insurance premiums, much like active federal and postal employees have the option of doing. Currently, federal retirees pay for their share of FEHBP premiums with after-tax funds from their annuities. Before they retire, however, postal and federal employees (and many private sector employees) can take advantage of “premium conversion.” Section 125 of the Internal Revenue Code allows them to pay for their health insurance with pre-tax dollars. Once the federal or postal employee retirees, they lose this benefit. HR 1203 would change this situation so that retired postal and federal employees would have the same opportunity as those on the active duty rolls. I ask that you support HR 1203 now... | |
Enter Your Name and Submit to Sign
People signing the "Please support HR 1203" petition!
View More Petition Signers and Comments
Frequently Asked Questions | Printer friendly .pdf
Petition created by Petition2Congress
Powered by Rally Congress Have questions or feedback?

Digg
MySpace
Reddit
Twitter
Thu., Nov. 26, 2009 8:02 PM link Rex F. | Quincy, CA
Please support HR 1203 - Premium ConversionThis comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Oct. 15, 2009 1:08 PM link APRIL T. | Rockwall, TX
Wed., Aug. 12, 2009 5:31 PM link Janice L. | Watertown, WI
Wed., Aug. 12, 2009 11:48 AM link Jay S. | Boston, GA
Sun., Aug. 9, 2009 1:28 AM link barbara c. | Huntley, IL
Sat., Aug. 8, 2009 12:58 PM link Mark A. | Knoxville, TN
Fri., Aug. 7, 2009 7:11 PM link Richard B. | Granite City, IL
Fri., Aug. 7, 2009 6:27 AM link Tim L. | Oklahoma City, OK
Fri., Aug. 7, 2009 6:09 AM link Nelson M. | Granite City, IL
Thu., Aug. 6, 2009 9:26 PM link donna c. | Lufkin, TX
Thu., Jul. 9, 2009 6:41 AM link frances s. | Goldvein, VA
I received this benefit when I was working at a much higher pay, now, when that I am retired this benefit is taken away. This benefit is needed much more in retirement and is another slap in the face to retirees.This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Sat., May. 30, 2009 5:57 PM link Marc G. | Nevada City, CA
Sat., May. 30, 2009 5:55 PM link Marc G. | Nevada City, CA
Tue., May. 19, 2009 9:21 PM link starla p. | Peru, IL
Mon., May. 18, 2009 1:54 PM link Name not displayed | Nevada, TX